Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re: Sad to see the Zuck... (Score 1) 499

Not disagreeing with you at all, but, I was referring to conversations here on Slashdot. Which, if anything talked about the cults of personality even more often than the media.
I won't even look at FB for at least another month for that very reason you stated. (Fortunately, I no longer have a long-distance job so avoiding it is easier than when I relied on it to keep up with my family. FB at that time had some importance in my life. Now that I work locally , not so much. )

Oh, to answer the last bit, judging by the reactions of people around me, they will hide in fear for at least a year (for the less paranoid) before they realize the world didn't end and POTUS doesn't mean 'dictator with unlimited power.' Also something to blame on the media with their exaggerated stories about Executive Orders and such making the Presidency out to be one person rule without limitation.

I don't care for President-elect Trumps authoritarian style, but the checks and balances will prevent him from running roughshod over the system.
While actual voter fraud is rare, paranoia is the medias stock and trade of late.

Saw some just as ridiculous headlines on Briebart about Hilary as well. They are all responsible for spreading their brand of paranoia.
(I read every side I can, and make up my own mind, for the most part, I came to the conclusion they're all full of shit.)
Unfortunately, I don't have time to look any examples up before my coffee's done and off to work.

Maybe when the shitstorm has cleared, people will wake up and start actually questioning those who....ah fuck, who am I kidding? People are sheep, and I very much doubt that will change unless there is actually blood running in the streets. (Ok, in some cases that seems to be happening, but you can't fix stupid, and nowadays, there is little excuse for being that uniformed) If your team lost, then you should be fighting harder next time, not rioting,making false accusations etc. (white people rioting no less, surprised it even got reported, though I haven't the time to read those stories until after work, so my knowledge is constrained at the moment to headlines.)

Oddly enough, one of the best, least biased explanations I saw, hidden under a very inflammatory headline, (and a fair bit of vulgarity in the body) for the difference between rural and urban voting was on Cracked...I know, that shouldn't be the case, but check out (and ignore the title, it has little to do with the article) 'how half of America lost it's f***ing mind.'
Someone else posted a link here, and I read it expecting something funny and irreverent, but got a very well thought out explanation of the difference in voters of rural and urban settings.

Coffee's done.
Peace out man!
Off to work!

Comment Re: Sad to see the Zuck... (Score 1) 499

Paper trail, checked multiple times against voter rolls.
Plus that was a very simplified explanation.
Plus Paper trail.
Can't be hacked from outside. (No net connection)
No machine to be hacked.
No system is perfect.

Did I mention paper trail?

It's actually very secure. To make a difference, you would have to steal way too many to not be noticed.
If you haven't received it by a specified date you contact the elections office.
Dupes? Checked multiple times by man and machine against rolls.
Lost? Provisional, just like everyone else.

The point I was making is it is more secure than these vote-flipping, prone to breakdown machines. If you chose to take it as a high school gymnasium with a bunch of stoners stuffing the ballots for the girl with the biggest tits, then that's on you.
After all, we aren't in the news for ballot irregularities.

Comment Re: Sad to see the Zuck... (Score 2) 499

Looking at RCP it's currently within 2m. That's basically a dead heat. I guess we had a hard time choosing who we hated more as neither are a clear winner with the populous. I think many votes were cast against candidates and not for candidates.

Personally, I voted policy over personality. (not that I agree down the line with either, just ones a tad closer to what I believe in, too bad they don't seem to believe in it once in office)

Seriously this election would of been better represented by the WWE.

(really loud, obnoxious announcer)
"November 8th, 2016, the match of the century is upon us! See the ultimate demonic duel of damnation!"
"The Creamsicle Charlatan vs. The Pantsuited Enabler no holds barred cage match. This is to the finish folks, no tag outs, no substitutions! Get your ballots now!"
It fits WWE better than it fits our ballots....

Kinda drifted off-topic there, damn good micro-brew. That's my story and I'm sticking with it...

Comment Re: Sad to see the Zuck... (Score 4, Insightful) 499

Why the fuck do that way. It's an issue at every election. Every. Single. One.
They need to do away with voting machines, period.

Here in Washington (not DC, the other one, no we are not part of Canada...) we do paper ballots. Most are mailed out and we drop them in any of 100's of boxes. There are permanent ones at libraries and the courthouse and hundreds of temporary ones during a general election.
We have a very strict accounting system overlooked by a bi-partisan pollsters at every step.
The mailed ballot has an outer envelope that identifies the voter, and an inner yellow security envelope than can have nothing written on it and the ballot enclosed and sealed.
After it is received they are electronically separated into districts and initially checked against registration rolls. They are then hand checked against voter rolls as the yellow envelopes are separated.
The separated vote then is removed and counted and all votes stored for a period (I'm unsure of how long.).
No problems large enough to make national news. A full paper trail. No internet, no machines to fuck up or be fucked with.
You can fill a vote out online and print it out. But the vote is only accepted at polling places or in-person drops as they don't have a second security envelope like the mailed ones.
Since it never touches the internet, you need physical access to do any fraud. That vastly complicates things compared to a few lines of code.

Sometimes the old fashioned way truly is best.

I don't know how costs compare, but with all the possibility of lawsuits, bad press, recounts and maintenance, I'm guessing it's not an astronomical difference. And I can be fairly confident that the counts are legitimate, as it would take some high-level fraud to cover up a paper trail with so many checks in place.

Comment Re: Sad to see the Zuck... (Score 2, Insightful) 499

Never. And this election just proved it.
By my completely biased viewpoint, issues were discussed like 1% of the time and the cult of personality vs the brick and what they allegedly did over the last decades made up the other 99%.
Personally, I voted policy, not personality.
I also voted for the losing side. But I'm not bitter, after all when your candidates only redeeming value is people seem to hate her slightly less. That's not a campaign strategy. That's desperation.
It was The Creamsicle Charlatan vs. The Pantsuited Enabler!
It should of been on WWE, not our ballots.

Comment Re: Translation (Score 1) 1081

Bullshit.
If Trump had lost the EC, you would be yelling it was rigged, etc.
The system needs work, but the blatant lies, innuendo and dis-proven accusations we hear constantly spouted by ignorant, ill-informed people do nothing at all to advance society.
Even when events prove the lies for what they are, some of you just can't let go.

This election was a cult of personality contest between an out-sized ego and a brick.

Romney/Obama debating was as dull as hell because they politely debated policy. Trump/Clinton had very little policy with a lot of name calling and bluster and got record viewership.
People care about personality, because they don't understand policy that can't be explained in a ten second sound bite. If that were reversed the first party to figure out the best policies that actually worked for the majority would be unbeatable.

This race has been good in two ways. Donald pulled the Republicans a tad left and both parties just got slapped in the face with the fact that Americans do not feel represented by either party. If the Republicans get complacent or double-down on the alt-right shit because they won this time, they will lose downstream big time. Donald won their nomination by saying fuck off to the party platform and incorporating some of the worst and best of both sides into his own version of Donpublicanism. He essentially became a third-party win as he expounds the core principles of neither side.

Fuck this, beautiful day, I'm off, stoned, rambling on Slashdot, off to the four B's for me!!
Buds
Beer
Bowling
Brick-oven pizza....

Comment Re: Trump says science is a fake (Score 1) 382

Well, without the unnecessary crudeness AC, you are correct. The Democrats fielded their weakest, most controversial candidate, SEVERELY underestimated their opponents appeal all in the name of historical precedence. They wanted two historical elections in a row so badly they blinded themselves to just how disliked their candidate was.

Of course, BOTH parties underestimated Mr. Trump. Both parties fielded despicable, dishonest, disliked candidates in a battle royal of accusation and innuendo. The mudslinging was so thick and the candidates both so dirty that it was hard to tell if anything stuck in the political pigpen.

Both parties are ripping apart at the seams. Perhaps a more centrist party will emerge from the smoldering wreckage. One that can field a strong candidate, unlike the current third-parties.

Invest in popcorn. The next four to eight years is going to be interesting.

I do hope President-elect Trump proves me wrong and is a great president. If not, he'll be gone in four years and we try again. Maybe if we can convince Cthulhu to be just a tad more evil....

Comment Re:I want capsule apartments (Score 1) 171

Ahh, the memories...
I lived in a 1960 primer red GMC van in the Bay Area for just short of a year. My employer let me park and use the restrooms after hours (He got a bit of nighttime security out of it), we used memberships at the Y to shower.
Unfortunately moved out of the area just as the tech boom really hit due to a personal tragedy.
If I could of held onto the house another few years, I would have made a killing.....sigh....

Comment Re: Proof that Satan is real (Score 2) 112

Ah but the partisan AC's prove that they both live in a fucking bubble.
Both parties support it. This is one of few things they stand together on!
https://www.wired.com/2016/04/senates-draft-encryption-bill-privacy-nightmare/
As for Hillary personally, she has no fucking clue! She rambles inchoerantly because she honestly doesn't know shit.
Trump doesn't know shit either.
Here's there stances:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/tech-policy-campaign-2016-where-candidates-stand-encryption/
It's CONGRESS we have to worry about people, the fucking figureheads are clueless!

Slashdot Top Deals

You will be successful in your work.

Working...