Getting back to subject.
This is actually the proper thing to do constitutionally.
Obama, from what I understand really overstepped his constitutional powers by enacting this in the first place.
I understand his heart was in the right place, but I believe this was an overreach of his powers and should be rescinded.
If the US wants it as part of our Law...then congress should be the ones to enact it.
If Obama, as president, doesn't have the authority to create laws, how does Trump, also (apparently) a president, have the authority to "unmake" them? Or in other words, if making law is the job of Congress, then unmaking law should be their responsibility also. It sounds like Trump is committing the same crime. Does nobody see that it's just as wrong when he does it?
Also leads to the counter-argument: "If there is no difference between the way women and men think or operate, then it is wrong to claim that diversity would improve a company, or have any effect on business"
If women bring nothing unique to the table, then diversity becomes solely a placating effort.
I don't think the point of insisting on diversity is to improve a company. No one gives a rat's ass about any company, other than the one they work for. On the other hand, I'm fairly sure that the goal is to improve society as a whole by improving the lives of those who have been treated the most unfairly; which is to say, to put an end to gender and/or race-based discrimination in terms of hiring, promotion, and compensation.
Actually, killing off the bees would be worse than this
Yes, but that was the joke part of the post...
Here's some facts to consider:
Given these figures, it would make more sense to take away their right to drink and/or drive.
Or, at least, get rid of the bees and wasps...
In American English, a majority of style guides mandate use of the serial comma, including APA style,[5] The Chicago Manual of Style, The MLA Style Manual, Strunk and White's Elements of Style,[6] and the U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual. In contrast, the Associated Press Stylebook and the stylebook published by The Canadian Press for journalistic writing advise against it. It is used less often in British English,[7] but some British style guides require it, including The Oxford Style Manual.[8] According to The Oxford Companion to the English Language, "Commas are used to separate items in a list or sequence
... Usage varies as to the inclusion of a comma before and in the last item ... This practice is controversial and is known as the serial comma or Oxford comma, because it is part of the house style of Oxford University Press."[9] Some use it only where necessary to avoid ambiguity,[10] in contrast to such guides as Garner's Modern American Usage, which advocate its routine use to avoid ambiguity.
Note that the U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual is one of the style guides that mandate the use of the serial comma. So maybe the state of Maine simply hasn't done its homework? And yes, I would have to agree with the truckers, especially since delivering milk for a dairy is NOT one of the seasonal jobs that the law was designed to account for. Just try to tell a herd of cows that they have to wait until spring to get milked. You'd have, I can't help saying, a moo-tiny on your hands.
Ernest asks Frank how long he has been working for the company. "Ever since they threatened to fire me."