Comment Re:I never liked the idea of C++0x11 (Score 1) 333
Again, more confusion created by crappy naming scheme.
Not really, you're the first person I've come across that's confused by it. But then again, that shouldn't be surprising because it's evident from reading your rant that you're just pretending to know what you're talking about. If there's one thing no one can accuse the C++ standards committee of, it is introducing changes that would break backward compatibility. So whatever new features require compiler updates, you can get your ass it's because a library only solution either wasn't possible or just so damn ugly that it was worth making a language change for it.
C++11 is great, and it really does mean you end up writing a lot less code in many cases because the language now gives you the tools to do things the correct way.
As for Boost and Qt not being compatible