Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:What part of this is hard to understand? (Score 1) 182

I honestly don't understand why traffic shaping by ISPs is necessary.

My mental model is:

* their pipes are such that they can support N units of simultaneous traffic (MB/s or whatever that may be)
* they have m subscribers
* therefore each subscriber is entitled to N/m units (or whatever the calculation is, if some subscribers pay for more bandwidth)
* a subscriber may transmit more than N/m units IFF the total number of units being transmitted is less than N (i.e. they get to use some other subscriber's allocation if that subscriber doesn't need it)
* so, as a subscriber your theoretical maximum rate is N and your actual minimum is N/m
* what application the subscriber is using their allocation for is irrelevant

Why is it not so? I assume I'm completely wrong about how traffic works, given that QoS is a thing.

Comment Upgrades (Score 5, Interesting) 62

I wonder what the emotional response to upgrading to a newer version will be.

If you feel nothing more than when you upgrade your phone, what level of emotional attachment can the robot really have achieved? On the other hand if you're so attached that you don't want to upgrade, there's no long term business model.

Perhaps the answer will be to treat upgrades as body transplants, so the "personality" or your robot is simply moved to a new shell.

Comment Re:Oh yeah? Then what are you gonna do about it? (Score 1) 410

The purchasing of stolen goods was just an example of an activity conducted in good faith (possibly by both parties - recall the containers of goods that washed up on a Scottish beach not long ago - the people who found them didn't always realise they were stealing when they looted them), which is nevertheless not legal, and whose illegality may not be discovered until some time later.

It seems Apple and Ireland entered into an agreement which the EU has ruled was illegal according to the laws of the time. Apple and/or Ireland may contest the interpretation of their deal as state aid, but the EU has identified it as such, and state aid was illegal at the time of the deal.

Comment Re:Oh yeah? Then what are you gonna do about it? (Score 1) 410

If I buy stolen goods from you in good faith (i.e. lawfully on my part), and it is discovered, should I be allowed to keep the goods?

Or, should I be required to surrender them to the rightful owner, in what I would regard to be a blatant retrospective change to the deal?

Comment Re: An easier sollution (Score 1) 1144

I've often (genuinely) wondered where gun advocates draw the line. Fully automatic? Grenades? RPGs? SAMs?

Presumably the basis for any line-drawing is destructive capability? Or perhaps more accurately, first-strike destructive capability, on the assumption that in a world where everyone is similarly armed, anyone who is undeterred will only get off one shot?

Comment Re:The UK, Providing Dystopian Visions Everywhere (Score 2) 70

I wonder if this is one of the costs of imperialism/multiculturalism. You import all manner of grievances, festering in segregated communities with which you have no informal ties through which you might do information gathering. All of a sudden, rather than dealing with the customary crimes you're dealing with invisible, existential threats from within your borders. You don't know how to build intelligence networks in the ghettos -- you don't know their customs, their tongues, their codes, and so whom you can trust -- and so instead you begin to watch everyone.

I could imagine that in monocultures, problems are identified much sooner and dealt with more subtly. Those with a history of repression will of course have their political police, but does Iceland (say) have a paranoid secret service?

Comment Re:I wish them luck, but... (Score 2) 273

There is such a thing as the quality of a debate, whereby people are expected to make their points with civility. If that's what's meant by a "safe" version of reddit, then I can see the merit. For example, I no longer look to Slashdot for tech discussion, because the comments appear to be dominated by uninformed and vitriolic opinion. (Next time there's a linux-related story, compare the discussion on slashdot with, for example, lwn.net.) Browsing the comments on stories like this is more of a guilty pleasure; it's kind of interesting to see just how one-sided the /. community appears to have become. Stick comment filtering on 2 and count the number of comments that are just variations of a sneering rant about SJWs and censorship.

Slashdot Top Deals

It isn't easy being the parent of a six-year-old. However, it's a pretty small price to pay for having somebody around the house who understands computers.