
Let California stack up a bunch of feel-good legislation like this, so the rest of us can point to them as an example of a failed nanny state.
Anyone suggesting this in the face of a $44 billion budget deficit should be run out of town.
You reduce your company's exposure, or risk, to certain failures.
Part of quantifying that is stating the cost of catastrophe. That's the big scary part of the pitch.
But since there is always competition afoot (outsourcing IT), you must also quantify how much time the little things you do save the company, if say the response time of an outside IT vendor is 24 hours or whatever it would be. If you need to know what the response time is, call some as if you were looking to outsource your company's IT and ask them. Then add a little because it's never as efficient as they'll claim.
You had mail. Paul read it, so ask him what it said.