Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment I Naively Installed DCFC Stations (Score 5, Interesting) 352

Wordy but Necessary...

In an attempt to help advance the adoption curve of EV's, I foolishly/naively installed 2 DCFC stations at the Ute Pass on US 24. I worked with a State program that reimbursed $70k of the $200k investment. I expected it to be a loss leader for a year or two. I did not expect that:

- ChargePoint depends on a hodgepodge of contractor/partners to conduct its installations - with no standardization, oversight, nor checks and balances. You and your friends can become installers next week, do halfway work, get paid, and suffer no consequences. It happened to me. Once.

- Not every power company has EV friendly rates. My three phase power, required for DCFC stations, comes with a peak demand fee based on my busiest 15 minutes (no matter the time of day) multiplied by $14.35. So if I give a Tesla or a Rivian 125 kW for 15 minutes straight, that discrete charge costs 125kw*$14.35=$1793.75. Imagine having to amortize the cost of one charge across an unknown monthly number of charges. Consequently, I now limit charges to 62.5 kw, which cuts "Fast Charging" in half. It is more than enough for the first generation of BEV's.

- Many EV's depend on Google Maps' data for their in-car navigation. It took 6 months to get my stations listed on Google - and not as my business (they still won't list it) but as a site I added to Google Maps as a random Maps user. For 6 months every EV driver looking at their dash for stations just drove by. ChargePoint is worthless at helping their drivers and their station owners. I have 6 wasted months of support tickets to prove it.

- Independent charging operators do not control the software, so we cannot throttle our stations' power use to avoid demand charges. Tesla can. A station owner can submit feature requests to manage peak power demands via software, but their software developers (if even in-house) do not seem to ride the clue train. These request fall on the deaf ears of an understaffed support team with a ticket response time of about 8 days.

- Not all stations can afford to provide power at a cost lower than gasoline. My power company, an EMC, is in the charging business. I am the only DCFC operator in their service area. (Did I mention that I was a fool?) They charge $.40/kWh, and less for their members. I charge $.48/kWh - which is on par with the cost of gasoline per gallon, but far more than you would pay at home. I do charge less than Ethanol free gas which is probably a better comparison than regular gas.

- Every month I pay to subsidize the EV's which charge at my stations. I repeat that I expected this to be a loss leader, and that I am a fool. I did not anticipate an approximate $80k loss of over 5 years - if I am lucky. For my spreadsheets to turn green, I need more cars charging than I see coming up the mountain. Demand is pretty inelastic.

- I can get salespersons galore to talk to me about buying and installing new stations. I get crickets for support of my existing stations.

Guess who is *NOT* buying any more stations to help advance the adoption curve? This is the job of the car manufacturers. Dante said it best, "Abandon all hope ye who enter here."

Comment Re:When you can't sell.. (Score 5, Interesting) 34

I have doubts the company was very profitable if this happened. Usually owners sell the company..and this finances their retirement. At the least, Valve would have had an interest in acquiring them.

So the cynic in me thinks this is a spin doctoring for the founder to move away from a business that wasn't profitable or sellable.

Unfortunately, every worker owned tech cooperative I was familiar with has gone out of business or is struggling. Noble idea, terrible results. Case in point: TechCollective now shows 5 employees on LinkedIn. I recall them being 30+ in 2010. Other MSPs have grown exponentially in the meantime.

Profitability has nothing to do with a decision to let the people who run the company actually own the company. Usually owners don't care as much about their employees and the company culture, so they sell out without taking care of the people who made them successful. The realist in me sees this as far more sustainable, equitable, and economically beneficial.

Fortunately, every employee-owned company I am familiar with is thriving. I seek them out because they are more accountable. There will be more over time and I anticipate logarithmic growth.

Comment Re:He needs to change the record (Score 4, Informative) 92

I respect hismopinions but the world has moved on, it's not the 1990s anymore and (most) linux users are no longer puritan zealots but pragmatic people trying to use an OS they like to gets shit done. If a small percentage is proprietary, so what? That's a genuine question, so TF what?

Not a problem for "people trying to use an OS." Key word is USE. Proprietary is a problem for those trying to develop, maintain, and sustain.

Comment POSITIVITY - I KNOW RICHARD PERSONALLY (Score 1, Interesting) 640

I know Richard. He has stayed in my home. We have commuted together. I have conducted conferences that featured him.

We have been to "clubs" together. We have broken bread together. He has used my computers. I have cleaned up after him.

Some people know how to write. Richard is one of them. He says what he means and he means what he says. He Acts.

Some people do not read very well. They see what they want and hear what is already in their head. They Re-Act.

The night we were in a club in Waikiki, I could not compete with the attention Richard attracted. Why or how could I? The man wore a Thinkpad around his neck with some kind of a makeshift neck sling. He was adored by all because he was purely human. Big boys and girls with good Karma know how to react to a real human.

No one has given me better entrepreneurial advice than Richard. Ever. He fully understood that being in public service meant that you still had to pay your bills. Freedom comes at a cost.

I can read who among you do not know Richard. I can read who among you cannot read. So can the rest of us.

Your behavior is forgivable, but the world would be rounder if you applied your outrage where it belonged. Please.

We can measure the success of RMS by the magnitude of misguided outrage. Well done, Richard. Well done.

Comment Re:Call Nathan Sidwell to account (Score 1) 640

Do you know Richard? Has he spent two weeks with you in your house in Hawaii? Have you commuted in a car with him? Have you gone to a "club" with him? Tell me, please, how people perceived these referenced cards when coming from a man with a Thinkpad strung around his neck? Because that's how RMS rolls when he's clubbing. Paint that scene with your generous imagination. Perhaps people saw him as he is - an unabashedly honest and transparent human.

I can tell in this awful abuse of a human who actually has a soul, who knows Richard, and who is working out their own issues at the expense of RMS and a man who is no longer living. Reprehensible context to achieve moral superiority. Reprehensible.

I have never met a more strategic entrepreneur. I have never been around someone that could charm an audience of strangers who knew or cared nothing about software freedom - until meeting RMS. I've never seen so many people simply like a human as I saw people like Richard in Hawaii.

I could have been jealous, but instead I admire him, still. RTFM, and RTFemails. Words matter more than how your misguided feelings interpret them.

Comment Go OPNSense - Netgate is a Pillager (Score 1) 60

If you don't know your history of how Netgate hijacked the pfSense project for profit, or how sinister the shills running Netgate are, then wake up and do some homework. If you believe in the values of a community driven distribution, with integrity, then start avoiding the insidious trolling of the Netgate team and move onward and upward. Leave it to Jim Thompson to become so desperately insecure that he attacks the integrity of the FreeBSD project rather than consulting his changelogs in a mirror. Live free or risk being pfscked.

Comment Free, Net Neutral Access at 1.5 Mbps (Score 1) 218

This article, and too many of the the comments, are completely clueless. I chose to get a T-Mobile hotspot because of Binge On. My responsibility as a consumer requires some due diligence. I learned that I could stream content from providers for free if they participated in a programs that would reduce the quality of my video to that which could be carried at 1.5 Mbps. Great for a mobile device, tablet, and even a laptop. Not so great for a 4K TV.

But I knew this because it was a hotspot from a mobile provider with a clearly stated policy about what to expect for free. If I wanted to use all of the 6GB I paid for at full resolution watching any video service I wanted, then all I had to do was to turn off Binge On. Wow. Such a violation of my rights as a net user.

Let's repeat. T-Mobile offers a free video feed at 1.5mbps. Free net access at 1.5mbps. How Net Neutral can one be?

Comment Ride Sharing, or, Save the Taxis (Score 1) 65

Twitter's single biggest mistake, in my humble opinion, was overlooking ride sharing. I don't want to use a paid ride sharing service where I don't know the people, the driver, or what kind of music I will hear during the ride. I would prefer to twit my ride and go with someone I know something about.

They can monetize this quite easily by charging the regulated Taxi industry a small percentage when a twitter user summons their service and pays through their Twitter account. You don't always have a twitter friend nearby when you need a ride. It would be a shame to see a company with so much momentum and promise fail due to hubris.

Submission + - YouTube goes 4K at CES along with VP9 (muktware.com)

sfcrazy writes: YouTube will demonstrate 4K videos at the upcoming CES. That’s not the best news, the best part of this story is that Google will do it using it’s own open sourced VP9 technology. Google acquired the technology from O2 and open sourced it. Google started offering the codec on royalty free basis to vendors to boost adoption. Google has also learned the hardware partnership game and has already roped in hardware partners to use and showcase VP9 at CES. According to reports LG (the latest Nexus maker), Panasonic and Sony will be demonstrating 4K YouTube using VP9 at the event. Google today announced that all leading hardware vendors will start supporting the royalty-free VP9 codecs. These hardware vendors include major names like ARM, Broadcom, Intel, LG, Marvell, MediaTek, Nvidia, Panasonic, Philips, Qualcomm, RealTek, Samsung, Sigma, Sharp, Sony and Toshiba.

Comment NX, but, in all reality (Score 2) 165

On a personal level, I have always liked the NX Protocol. It's easily installable on Ubuntu or CentOS. You can choose between the free and open source route, or for an enterprise roadmap, NoMachine reigns supreme in my experience.

NoMachine packages its free client/server solution for what seems to be any gnu/linux distro. Its IOS and Android clients are due for release in the coming months and can solve the original poster's "problem". I have no affiliation with nomachine other than being a bit of a fan due to their community commitments.

In all reality it becomes a matter of servers, clients, and protocols that fit within your network's architecture with varying degrees of comfort and performance.

Slashdot Top Deals

"It's my cookie file and if I come up with something that's lame and I like it, it goes in." -- karl (Karl Lehenbauer)

Working...