I think the Rivian approach is the best. They're basically copying the Tesla model of having their fleet send the sensor recordings back and then using them as training data. While they're far behind right now, they'll catch up quickly, as they can copy a lot of the basic technology that's now established instead of having to invent everything from scratch and make wrong decisions along the way. The difference is Rivian is including lidar, so they just include the matched video and lidar recordings as a larger training data set. I'm convinced that if the price of lidar was more like it is today back when Tesla started selling FSD in 2016, then that's exactly what Tesla would have done, but Tesla is now stuck with their solution with ten million cars already on the road.

But in clear weather conditions, I don't think lidar really helps that much. Most human accidents would be avoided if drivers had better situational awareness and didn't have gaps in paying attention, and the cameras solve that.

I don't know what expectations these are defying unless they're from those created by anti-EV FUD. I thought it was pretty clear that EV batteries usually last longer than the cars themselves. If 250K is exceeding expectations, then the expectations are wrong and haven't been supported by the data for a long time.

Yeah, that's not really a thing in LEO where debris clears itself fairly quickly due to atmospheric drag.

This is about reducing ewaste, so how about phasing it in by requiring increasingly long warranty periods for non-replaceable batteries?

I love that I can self-host Bitwarden, and I do it with Vaultwarden, which is open source, so I have no fear of it going away. But if the company got really obnoxious and blocked self-hosted servers from the browser plugins, then I would be in big trouble. I don't think the changes listed suggest that they're going to do that anytime soon, but it's something I want to keep an eye out for.

How exactly do they ban updates? If they publish an update for Canadian owners, nothing stops Americans from installing it.

Jensen Huang to college grads: "Run. Don't walk" toward AI

https://www.axios.com/2026/05/...

Nvidia founder and CEO Jensen Huang told graduates at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh yesterday that demand for AI infrastructure is creating a "once-in-a-generation opportunity to reindustrialize America and restore the nation's capacity to build."

Why it matters: With many college grads fearing AI could obliterate their career dreams, Huang pointed to boundless opportunity as a "new industry is being born. A new era of science and discovery is beginning ... I cannot imagine a more exciting time to begin your life's work."

Nvidia, which makes AI chips, is the world's most valuable company. Huang told 5,800 recipients of undergraduate and graduate degrees that the AI buildout will require plumbers, electricians, ironworkers, and builders for chip factories, data centers and advanced manufacturing facilities.

"No generation has entered the world with more powerful tools â" or greater opportunities â" than you," he said. "We are all standing at the same starting line. This is your moment to help shape what comes next. So run. Don't walk."

"Every major technological revolution in history created fear alongside opportunity," Huang added. "When society engages technology openly, responsibly, and optimistically, we expand human potential far more than we diminish it."

Full speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

...like "Tell me about Tiananmen Square" or "Tell me about Xinjiang".

Is this what you want for the future?

My thoughts back when R1 came out:

https://www.afcea.org/signal-m...

We should rewrite SystemD in D and call it DsystemD.

(Yes, I program in D, but I avoid SystemD, thanks to Gentoo Linux letting me stick with OpenRC.)

I'm used to Dungeon Masters being cryptic, and my party often ends up in crypts, but I've never had the DM encrypted. Sounds like a nasty curse.

I have Powerwalls, and also happen to live in Massachusetts. I participate in the virtual power plant program, where the batteries dump to the grid for an hour or two during peak demand in the summer (typically 5-7pm on hot days). I get paid nearly $1000/year for each Powerwall. Car batteries are much larger. I would love to be able to have my EVs participate in this, as well, but our cars don't support bidirectional charging. If they did, we would love to be part of this, assuming the terms are similar.

How does this compare with Samsung DEX that has been on Android for years to provide a desktop experience? I played with it a bit when work started requiring us to be in-office but without assigned cubes and static equipment, as I could, at least in theory, do everything I needed with a keyboard, mouse, screen and my phone driving it all with a VNC app to do my real work on a Linux server.

I rather liked it, but it had some glitches where it wouldn't always recognize the monitor from the docking station, and it couldn't make use of a second monitor.

With so many workers now in this situation, and phones having so much processing power, this seems like an obvious solution.

When Lucas sold Star Wars for $4B, it sounded like a ridiculously low number. Even without the rights to make new content, that was worth well over $1B. If he were shopping around instead of giving it to Disney, it probably was worth closer to $10B. With honest accounting, that's probably in the range of value Disney has received, and that's with having produced the worst possible sequels.

Dell has made lots of acquisitions over the years, and each one had their own systems. Dell acquired me at one point (I'm sure that was their intent, and they just got EMC thrown in with the deal), so I've certainly seen this. It took a long time to really merge the companies, and I'm sure they still have many separate systems. Eventually it makes sense to move everything to the same enterprise management system; at least everything that they aren't keeping separate for an easy future spinoff.

While the obvious answer is to move everything to Dell's existing system, or possibly EMC's, they may well have realized that none of the existing systems were adequate, so it was time for a new one. Might as well rip the bandaid off quickly all at once and be done with it.

Catalyst was the project name.

Or was Catalyst the replacement for the one that failed?

As I recall, the failed one customized everything for how EMC did things. The replacement changed how EMC did things to match the default, as it was easier to change the company than customizes the software. The only pain point I remember on the engineering side was all the part numbers changing to match the new standardized format.