Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:OO is a cult (Score 1) 510

I disagree and agree. OO for the sake of OO does not make sense. Before I did OO built large, reusable code libraries. OO came into it's own with me when I understood the principles enough to write classes pretty much from scratch so I was not trying to work around the limitations of some one else's implementation. It took me years to get competent at writing truly reusable OO code. I can't imagine teaching it from scratch. Start out using a OOP language as a "better" procedural language and OOP stuff comes in gradually, after learning program structure, design, code reuse etc. But then again, hindsight is a handy pair of rose colored glasses.

Comment Re:Pascal or Perl (Score 1) 510

Pascal: agree. I learned Turbo Pascal about 100 years ago, the compiler I got (for free, from Borland) came with Turbo Debugger/Assembler. Learned Pascal quik, and learned ASM from Looking at the Turbo Debugger output. Coming directly from COBOL to PC programming, it made the landing a lot softer. With that said, now there are so many alternatives than 20 years ago. What ever became of the idea of looking at compiler output in ASM with the input source code as comments?

Slashdot Top Deals

The universe does not have laws -- it has habits, and habits can be broken.

Working...