Comment Re: Engineer me a grasshopper... (Score 1) 153
Plenty of mosquitoes do exactly that
Plenty of mosquitoes do exactly that
And this is why till the late 80's German cars didn't have cup holders.
I have friends who have done time in the Conservation Camps. I also have had friends who have worked for CalFire. The difference in conditions between the two is pay, and alcohol. Both jobs are dangerous. Both jobs involve sitting at a remote location preparing and waiting to run in to an active fire. The friends who were in the conservation camps ALL say they are glad the spent time there.
SETI: "No REALLY! We'll find in in the next 25 years! Pinky swear!"
I'm not sure what you think you're making fun of here. You're right in that SETI has yet to find anything. There's nothing wrong with this. No one in that field is seriously stating that we will find evidence of intelligent life in X number of years. They are simply continuing to test the hypothesis that intelligent life exists. Nothing more, nothing less.
In instead of all this high-tech Rube Goldberg nonsense, why not just get rid of the guns?
While I am in favor of reasonable gun control laws, this is not going to solve the entire issue. The root cause for these shootings needs to be determined, or they'll just find another way to cause more death. But where in this country we're more concerned with incarceration than reform and prevention, that will not happen anytime soon.
My point is this - if you donate sperm, you might have to pay to raise that child. If you think that's a great deal and righteous then yank that crank and pay the bill.
And the point of everyone else that has posted in response is that you keep using that link to justify an alarmist view that EVERY man who donates is in danger of being called on to pay child support. This is not happening. The article lists very specific cases where this happened, and none of them were of men who got called out by a woman who was a complete stranger to him. Now, if you want to argue that these cases listed were unfair, that's a valid viewpoint. Go ahead and argue that. But stop generalizing it.
Now if there ARE a significant number of cases where this DID happen, then, yes, that is cause for concern. But I'm not seeing this.
According to the article, the control group showed similar improvements. Therefore, it is not due to UBI.
The control group was likely the result of a placebo effect. The small amount of money they got -- or perhaps just the idea that someone gave a shit -- was enough to boost their confidence and let them pull themselves out of their situation. Either way, it worked.
On a previous job, I had a colleague who was openly gay, One day, I'm in the bathroom taking a piss. He walks in and starts doing his business in the urinal next to me. I thought nothing of it. Why? Because he's not there to hit on other men or sneak peeks at guys' wieners. He was there same as me, to take a piss, and that's it. Ever since then, I realized all the talk about being the bathroom police to be utterly stupid.
NEWS FLASH! If someone is going into the "wrong" bathroom for illicit purposes, no law is going to stop that.
For instance, lets use Slashdot as an example - how many years have
One of the reasons people do this is because users keep posting links to paywalled or adwalled sites. I'm not going to read an article that I need to register an account for the privilege of reading it or turn off my ad-blocker so they can shove a hundred irrelevant ads in my face. The fact that this article lead to something I could actually READ was a breath of fresh air.
Yeah, the websites are out there. Just sign up for a free account today! Support us by turning off ad-blocker!
No thanks.
You had mail, but the super-user read it, and deleted it!