"Asked about the congressional committee to study the merits and drawbacks of device encryption proposed by Sen. Mark Warner, D-Virginia, and Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, Vance said he worried that such a process would take too long and endanger lives."
If they really want to reduce the danger to lives, perhaps they should quit shooting unarmed people who pose no risk or credible threat.
"Law enforcement agencies are not requesting a backdoor."
No, they're demanding it.
"I don't see why the company can't continue to provide the same strong encryption it previously provided..."
It wasn't strong, so they fixed it. Boohoo, it makes you have to do real detective work; like before the days of mass surveillance.
"Justice is being denied because companies have redesigned their devices to satisfy their shareholders."
Cops like to claim denial of justice because they have to do some actual police work instead of having criminals incriminate themselves. Cell phones are not a data collection tool for law enforcement, they are personal property. Apple and Google are appeasing their consumers so that they can sell products. The fact that they are not making life easier for law enforcement does not mean they are siding with criminals, obstructing justice, or any other scaremongering political move as DA Vance implies. Law enforcement has clearly demonstrated a lack of concern for due process and citizen rights with the constant barrage of secret surveillance tactics (e.g. NSL, StingRays).