Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Those positions have always been there. (Score 3, Interesting) 373

Wow. I don't know which Google you worked for.

Also speaking from experience, I work between 40 and 50 hours a week. I occasionally respond to an email in the evening, if I notice it and it's easily addressed. Otherwise I leave it until morning. Performance reviews are peer driven, and I've never even *heard* of anyone getting negative marks for taking vacation, let alone having it happen to me. I'm respected and trusted by my largely highly competent peers, and nobody expects me to kill myself working. Sure, sometimes there are emergencies and crunch times, and there are crappy parts of every job, but this is a *very* good place to work.

Comment Re:Cheers for PETA (Score 1) 820

My perspective may be colored by too much science fiction.

I defined sentience as something like human-level self awareness and intelligence, and assumed that definition was more or less universal. However, at least according to Wikipedia, there's plenty of precedent for the way you're using it.

I think there's a philosophical (or at least semantic) argument buried in there, but it doesn't really matter in relation to your original point that animals can suffer, which is perfectly valid.

Please accept my apology for the derail. It wasn't really relevant and I tend toward the pedantic. ;)

Comment Re:Cheers for PETA (Score 1) 820

Not that I disagree with your sentiment, but since when is the definition of sentience "can experience suffering"? Because an animal can feel pain and fear does not necessarily make them sentient. Sentience is not a prerequisite for the application of ethics.


NASA's LCROSS Mission Proves Lunar Ice Suspicions 177

NASA is reporting that preliminary data from the LCROSS mission indicates that there really is water in one of the permanently shadowed lunar craters, just as they suspected back in September. "'We are ecstatic,' said Anthony Colaprete, LCROSS project scientist and principal investigator at NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif. 'Multiple lines of evidence show water was present in both the high angle vapor plume and the ejecta curtain created by the LCROSS Centaur impact. The concentration and distribution of water and other substances requires further analysis, but it is safe to say Cabeus holds water.'"

Comment Re:Easy (Score 1) 1091

I had a severe dislike for corporate politics because it irritated me. Now I'd welcome it and play the game, knowing my frustration was due to a genetic condition.

You know, that may just indicate good sense.

Comment Re:Should have used PHP. (Score 2, Interesting) 324

That's fine for the vast majority of web applications, but you clearly don't understand the scale of the traffic a site like Twitter receives. What do you do when one database machine, no matter how fast, isn't enough? When your load balancer gets overloaded? How about handling that massive search index?

Even a site as simple as Twitter will present you with problems you never expected once it gets that popular. Starting off with something like you suggested is exactly what gets them in the mess they're in now. It must be designed for parallelism and scalability or it will fall over.

That said, if it's properly designed, you can probably make it work in any language, although you can dramatically reduce the number of production machines it takes if you have an efficient compiler/interpreter.

Comment Re:Solved? (Score 1) 774

Maybe God is everywhere, aware of us, and simply choosing not to communicate.

Disproving God deductively is the opposite of science. The lack of easily obtained evidence for God's existence is far from damning given the area that we are capable of observing with any real scrutiny.

Funny how an argument makes sense in one context but not so much in another. I'm not stating anything about the existence or non-existence of aliens or God, but rather that the argument of "they might exist because you can't prove they don't" is not a very good one.

Slashdot Top Deals

panic: kernel trap (ignored)