You think that if that same election were held today, the outcome would be the same?

Hint: Trump doesn't have anywhere near the support today he did in November 2024.

... now with less privacy!

Which game is that? The "game" where you provide evidence backing your claim? That's not a "game" - that is proper argumentation.

It's not our responsibility to prove your claim - that's your job. Thinking you can just throw whatever you want out with no evidence to back it up is how bad faith arguments work: haystack someone with bullshit, and they have to spend all their time knocking down your bullshit.

Fuck that. Don't argue in bad faith.

Found the guy who thinks Trump will be in charge forever.

What's the statute of limitations on insider trading?

Care to take that risk? Go ahead and sign up.

What's going to be awesome is when the SEC starts shitting all over anyone actually using this service while completely ignoring the source of the insider information.

Anyone with an actual trading license that they want to keep should steer very wide of this shit.

If they are using AI, how do they have such brittle infrastructure? Shouldn't they be using the AI to fix their shitty network that can't handle the load?

Well, the company that signs an NDA has a duty to protect something once it's in their possession. If it was on an encrypted drive and someone was to do something that fucking dumb, they would certainly have made a case for negligence against themselves.

The producers of this film may as well have put it on some shitbox web server and emailed a link for all the security they chose.

It's just not that hard.

Straw man. Let me help you:

1. try to stay on topic instead of flailing about like a fucking idiot.
2. before you knock down something I never said, first show that I said it.
3. I'm glad you're so upset by something I've posted in the past that you feel the need to still be butthurt about it. I love knowing I've influenced you, and have a free spacious room inside your head any time I need it.

Yes, because marketing chuds have never employed hyperbole before to astound and amaze, in order to make a sale.

Not even once.

Which is why Tesla's autopilot started with highways first. It was a very useful de-scope of rules in order to build a minimum-viable thing, and then build upon that thing.

Why not, SCOTUS is already making it up as they go along and ignoring 50+ years of SCOTUS precedent.

Seems like that's what we do now.

Or just used an Ironkey, and sent them a password / combo separately as you say.

They don't even need to be technical folk - there are retail products available for at least 15 years that solve this exact problem.

1. producer was an idiot and sent them a copy of their unreleased product on an unencrypted drive.
2. someone boosted the drive from Netflix's offices, along with many other drives
3. producer gets mad that Netflix lost it, while taking no accountability themselves for spending an extra $100 for a hardware encrypted drive that requires a password or combination to decrypt and mount

Seriously, this is negligence on the part of the dumbass producer that did not bother with reasonable protections for their own work product, and now they are trying to blame Netflix.

Fuck this guy.

Other than it being a pre-released copyrighted work that they don't want rampantly pirated before they have even sold the rights. Yeah, no reason to encrypt your $45M property to prevent unauthorized release.

Are you totally daft?

BUY AN ENCRYPTED DRIVE IF IT'S SO HARD.

Encrypted USB drives exist, and have for a long damn time. It uses a password to unlock.

There's no excuse here. They needed to buy a different device and not be complete chuds.