Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Minecraft.... (Score 1) 161

Way to make his point.

And actually pull up Tesla's financial report before spouting that nonsense. I'll help. http://files.shareholder.com/d...

See the lines "Revenues" and "Cost of Revenues", where the former is greater than the latter. That's profit. Something tells me game developers don't require billions of dollars in capital expenses for manufacturing facilities, service centers, etc. Geese, why do I bother. You're probably just trolling.

Comment Re:Here's a thought (Score 2) 161

"never individually bought a car that cost more than $15k" You must be buying used or just buying the absolute cheapest new cars on the market. Don't compare used cars to new cars. You're absolutely right about the depreciation. The smartest thing to do financially is buy a 3 year old car with low miles. It's nearly 50% cheaper, but still practically new.

Now that that's out of the way, let's talk apples and apples. Looking forward to the Model 3, assuming a $35k MSRP, the 5 year TCO should be lower than a $35k BMW or something else in that price range. Why? $1,000 or more saved on gasoline per year. That's at least $5k over 5 years. If gas were to go back up to $3 - $4 per gallon, that would be up to $10k in savings. Reduced maintenance. No oil changes and air filter changes. While these aren't terribly expensive ($200-$300 per year), they're a nuisance. I value not having to carve out slots of time for oil changes.

Early adopter. Being an early adopter is never the financially prudent move. But when you buy your $10 DVD player from Wal-Mart, you should be thankful for the early adopters who shelled out $1,500 for the first DVD players because they made your cheap DVD player possible. Same with EVs. in 2010, battery costs were $1000 / kwh. Today, 6 years later they're under $200 / kwh and more advanced to boot. They're projected to fall under $100 / kwh in short time. This is thanks in large to the high volume producers/consumers of the "expensive" EVs.

There's nothing wrong with being financially prudent, but don't think just because your financial math doesn't work for you today, the math is "bleak" for EVs. And when you're buying your $15k used Model 3 in the future, remember to be thankful to the Model S/X and early Model 3 owners who made it a reality.

Comment Re:this is (Score 4, Informative) 1368

http://www.politifact.com/trut...

"After going through all of his comments from this past weekend, it seems that Trump definitely wants a database of Syrian refugees, and he hasn’t ruled out the possibility of a database for all Muslims -- though he isn’t actively calling for the latter. And we’ll warn you now that many of Trump’s comments strike us as contradictory or confusing."

The last line pretty much sums up Trump's "stances" - contradictory or confusing.

Comment Re:You are entering a carbon-friendly area (Score 1) 693

It would be OK if we were just arguing about different solutions to AGW, which is what you're doing. The biggest problem though, is the denialists argue that we don't have a problem. Actually, they'll take any stance as long at the outcome is - do nothing. You sound like a perfectly rational person, which seem to be in short supply.

Comment Re:But climate change is a myth!!! YODA GREASE (Score 1) 206

Wow. Maximum Pessimism. The ability to travel long distances with an EV is practically here. Fast Charge DC and 200+ mile affordable (average price) EVs coming this year and the next and only increasing and growing cheaper afterwards. Please have a look and plugshare or Tesla's supercharger map. How well do you think gas cars would work without gas stations?

As for "Lithium is inadequate", do some research before stating something so false. Lithium-air, for instance, has a higher theoretical gravimetric energy density than gasoline, given that most of gasoline's energy is wasted as heat. The energy is combustion is not just from the gasoline. It also uses oxygen from the air. Today's lithium-ion batteries used are just adequate, but the potential exceeds that of petroleum. "Batteries are expensive" is so terribly short-sighted. The costs of plunged and are forcasts to continue under $100/kWh. And that's without any advancements. A short look at battery history shows we've come a long way in technology and costs and the EV revolution is driving R&D, which is key.

Comment Re:But climate change is a myth!!! YODA GREASE (Score 1) 206

"AGW is not some immediate problem that needs to be solved tomorrow. It will unfold over decades, and the solution will also take decades."

The consequences will unfold over decades, but the problem is certainly immediate and it should have been "solved"/mitigated 15 years ago. I agree nearly 100% with your proposals as to how to address it. Anyone who thinks to world will revert to Amish style living tomorrow is just naive. The biggest problem we have is ignorance mostly due to the intentional spread of misinformation, the "Merchants of Doubt". We won't agree on how to solve the problem, but it's ridiculous that people still believe there isn't one.

Comment Re:So Christianity is right... (Score 1) 213

Saying "you should believe" has always amused me. It's not like I can decide to start believing something at will - I know there are such people, and I consider them mentally, intellectually, a bit low at least on some areas.

I could act like I'm believer, but it would be an act, not real belief, and then there's the problem that all these man-made religions claim that their God is right, and there's hundreds of them, but there is only one potential God. Luckily I can't believe a God would care about what religion your into, unless it's purely evil.

Comment Misleading Title (Score 1) 178

The title is misleading.

We sampled 5000 12-second clips from our catalog, covering a wide range of genres and signal characteristics. With 3 codecs, 2 configurations, 3 resolutions (480p, 720p and 1080p) and 8 quality levels per configuration-resolution pair

and then

x265 and libvpx demonstrate superior compression performance compared to x264, with bitrate savings reaching up to 50% especially at the higher resolutions. x265 outperforms libvpx for almost all resolutions and quality metrics, but the performance gap narrows (or even reverses) at 1080p.

So the highest resolution they tested was 1080p and performance between the 2 codecs was very close with libvpx beating out x265 in some cases. As far as bandwidth goes, saving at 1080p and above is more valuable than saving at 480p. Practically everything we watch at home is streamed 1080p. I don't see that x265 is the winner here. And where are the 4k tests?

Slashdot Top Deals

I have never seen anything fill up a vacuum so fast and still suck. -- Rob Pike, on X.

Working...