Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Science or Religion? (Score 1) 1136

ehh ... I am one of those folks that think ... it doesn't really matter and we should encourage the SCIENCE to move forward with study. I even think we should encourage climate science. But we all need to remember that most of what we think of as law is NOT law. Newton was not on the moon. Einstein did not know that each galaxy has at the middle a blackhole. And Al Gore does not like the way he is asking you to.

Comment Re:Science or Religion? (Score 1) 1136

yeah ... see newton was describing the effects of gravity. Its a law of observation. Much like "rain will make you wet" But why don't you go ahead and explain to us all how EXACTLY gravity works... OH and could you cite your base theory I love catching these morons in the gravity trap.

Comment Re:Science or Religion? (Score 1) 1136

Well gravity is more of a simple term like .... sky. There are MANY theories to why gravity is and how it works. So yes in a simple way Gravity and its many many effects/causes are as yet theory. See that's a perfect example... we know probably as much about climate (maybe less. Unless of course you would like to explain to us all how gravity works .... please cite your base theory

Comment Re:Meanwhile (Score 1) 1136

Global warming vs Global Climate change.... I am fPhucking your mom.... wait ... I am having sex with your uncles sister... is that better? If you really want to do something about our CO2 exhaust then take one for the team. Start with yourself .... lets stop that CO2 producing engine in its tracks.

Comment Re:Meanwhile (Score 1) 1136

The Hawaiian islands ALL OF THEM are sinking into the ocean.... is that because of AGW? James McClintock, Ph.D., is not a climatologist but rather a professor of biology.... I am a Math Masters.... ya want a some dental work done... i can help. / What did Eastern Antarctica look like in the 70's ? 30? 20s ? You tree-hugging utopia is falling away .... deal with it

Comment Re:Science or Religion? (Score 2, Insightful) 1136

Evolution is still considered a theory..... a pretty solid one .... but still - and no one is trying to redirect TRILLIONS of people money because of it Viri use RNA, And technically so do you - and no one is trying to redirect TRILLIONS of people money because of it The Earth is relatively young universal speaking J. B. S. Haldane (1892–1964) said that the discovery of a fossil rabbit in Precambrian rocks would be enough to destroy his belief in evolution. Philosopher Peter Godfrey-Smith doubted that a single set of anachronistic fossils, however, even rabbits in the Precambrian, would disprove the theory of evolution outright. The first question raised by the assertion of such a discovery would be whether the alleged "Precambrian rabbits" really were fossilized rabbits. Alternative interpretations might include incorrect identification of the "fossils", incorrect dating of the rocks, and a hoax such as the Piltdown Man was shown to be. Even if the "Precambrian rabbits" turned out to be genuine, they would not instantly refute the theory of evolution, because that theory is a large package of ideas, including: that life on Earth has evolved over billions of years; that this evolution is driven by certain mechanisms; and that these mechanisms have produced a specific "family tree" that defines the relationships among species and the order in which they appeared. Hence, "Precambrian rabbits" would prove that there were one or more serious errors somewhere in this package, and the next task would be to identify the error(s). So see ... when science wants to believe something they will regardless of the facts

Comment Re:Science or Religion? (Score 1) 1136

HEY STUPID !!!! "2009: Second Warmest Year on Record" THE TITLE SAYS IT ALL "The past year was only a fraction of a degree cooler than 2005, the warmest year on record, and tied with a cluster of other years — 1998, 2002, 2003, 2006 and 2007 1998 and 2007 — as the second warmest year since recordkeeping began." Funny how they forgot to mention that 1998 was just about the same temp at 1934 You just got owned with your own link that must really hurt

Comment Re:Science or Religion? (Score 1) 1136

"The past year was only a fraction of a degree cooler than 2005, the warmest year on record, and tied with a cluster of other years — 1998, 2002, 2003, 2006 and 2007 1998 and 2007 — as the second warmest year since recordkeeping began." Funny how they forgot to mention that 1998 was just about the same temp at 1934 You just got owned with your own link that must really hurt

Slashdot Top Deals

The trouble with money is it costs too much!

Working...