There's a typo in the headline. It's supposed to read "Microsoft Forms Superintelligence Team Under AI Chef Suleyman 'To Serve Humanity'".

I use the magsafe on my laptop. I almost always use the laptop in the same place and only charge it there, so it's not getting mixed into my collection and picked back out, and the magsafe is somewhat easier to fumble into place than USB-C. If I was using it long enough somewhere different to need to charge it, I'd grab a USB-C (probably already nearby), rather than collecting the magsafe from where it's set up.

They could include things like special lines at immigration, rather than just visa requirements. Arriving in Amsterdam with an EU passport is much less of a hassle than arriving with a US passport, but they both count the same on this report. Then there's the question of whether you need a permit to stay indefinitely, or just the passport.

The person who made the report is a professional penetration tester. His usual method is to look for anything that could be wrong and then test whether it actually is. What he found is that the AI tools came up with potential issues he hadn't thought of, and they weren't all wrong, so it's a valuable tool to him because he normally runs out of ideas rather than running out of time to test them. He complained about the UI making it hard to go through large lists of reported issues exhaustively, and he only used the suggested fixes to get a better idea of what the issue was supposed to be. So it's clear that the tool's output wouldn't be directly useful to a maintainer, but it does serve a purpose.

I got a third-party cable for my phone that my phone recognizes as being able to charge it faster than the cable that came with the phone could. They should probably warn you that they don't have a cable or charger, in case you're getting a phone because you lost everything and don't have that stuff, but the first-party stuff isn't better these days.

I think it's even more interesting, in that one or two humans have to decide whether to question a call, and they have to identify calls that were wrong, not just ones they want to overturn, and they don't have a great angle to figure out what the algorithm would do. I think it's going to be fun to see batters try to do the ump's job, while standing to the side and considering swinging at the pitch.

I think the real issue is warm parts of China selling to cold parts of India without including the features that aren't needed near the factory. We know lots about battery chemistry, but rural farmers have had more immediately relevant things to know about up to now and don't have a good source of information on this new thing the government is pushing, so they skip things that sound like luxuries and end up with something inappropriate for their purpose.

Depends entirely on what you're coding.

Ah you missed some crucial science there...

- Measured the rotation period of Mercury,
- First radar maps of Venus.
- First megamaser galaxy discovery.
- First extrasolar planet.
- First repeating fast radio burst.
- Near Earth asteroid observations.

https://www.sofia.usra.edu/sci....

You only think once...when you have to....if it's a Friday....and you're bored...Mr. Bond.

Really? This cartoon is awful on every level. The art is hideous. It insults your intentions. The message is obviously wrong. It stinks and runs contrary to FSF's stated goals. Who the hell authorized this? Stallman left didn't he?

> This is the cartoon version of when your mom catches you listening to rap, gets worried and has you listen to "clean, wholesome rap" instead that consists of some soccer mom trying to rap about getting an education and going to church.

And by listening to rap, you mean pleasuring yourself right? lol ;-)

Yeah that's what we need. More obscure difficult to remember names. That'll definitely make the world a better place for everyone and draw people into science. i really do hope you're trolling.

...instead of plastic straws wrapped in paper.

As if that's going to make the difference. In a few hundred years when we're all dead and buried, future generations will be scratching their heads and blaming our stupidity for our harsh lives.

Yeah, it's almost as if failing to check the source of your information makes you gullible.