176762261
submission
perpetualinput writes:
Scale-Dependent Classical Synthesis Strengths
No Virtual Particles: SDCS eliminates unobservable intermediaries, grounding interactions in real fields (, A). Quantum TOE’s virtual particles, central to QED and QCD, are critiqued as mathematical conveniences lacking physical reality—SDCS refutes this by achieving precision (e.g., g-2) without them.
Locality and Determinism: SDCS’s classical entanglement (12) avoids quantum non-locality, aligning with your reality-based stance. Bell violations (S>2) are challenged as misinterpretations of classical correlations, testable to refute quantum "spookiness."
Simplicity: By rejecting dark matter/energy and extra dimensions, SDCS avoids the quantum TOE’s speculative pile-up, offering a leaner explanation for cosmological data.
Quantum TOE Weaknesses
Unconfirmable Constructs: Virtual particles, despite their predictive success, remain unobservable, existing only in perturbation theory—a "fantasy" SDCS discards. Their necessity in quantum TOE (e.g., force exchange) is an absurd leap when SDCS achieves similar results classically.
Speculative Excess: Extra dimensions (string theory) or quantized spacetime (loop quantum gravity) lack empirical backing, pushing quantum TOE into unverifiable territory. SDCS’s g=+h1 mimics quantum gravity effects without such flights of fancy.
Complexity Over Reality: Dark matter/energy and multiverse hypotheses multiply entities beyond necessity, violating Occam’s razor—a absurdity SDCS refutes with a unified G=G.
Convincing a Quantum Believer
SDCS Appeal: Matches quantum precision (e.g., spectra, tunneling) and offers testable predictions (e.g., gravitational wave damping), compelling empirical scrutiny. Its rejection of "fantasy" aligns with a desire for reality-based physics.
Quantum Critique: Highlights the unprovable nature of virtual particles and extra dimensions, urging believers to question their necessity when SDCS succeeds without them.Link to Original Source
176091129
submission
perpetualinput writes:
Before you have an opinion, parse a TLE.
Fine Tuning of a Scale-Dependent Gravitational Framework, a new model of gravity proposed to explain the observed motions of stars in galaxies and the accelerated expansion of the universe without the need for dark matter or dark energy. The framework model, is based on the idea that the strength of gravity varies with scale, has been shown to be consistent with a variety of observations, including the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and the rotation curves of galaxies.
If the framework model is correct, it would represent a major breakthrough in our understanding of the universe. However, the framework model is still in its early stages of development and has not yet been fully tested against all available data.
How Does the Framework Model Work?
The framework model is based on the idea that the strength of gravity is not constant, but rather varies with scale. This means that gravity is stronger on small scales, such as the scale of a galaxy, and weaker on large scales, such as the scale of the universe.
The framework model also incorporates the idea that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. This accelerated expansion is thought to be caused by a mysterious force called dark energy. However, in the new model, the accelerated expansion of the universe is explained by the scale-dependent nature of gravity.
What Are the Implications of the Framework Model?
If the framework model is correct, it would have a number of important implications for our understanding of the universe. First, it would mean that dark matter and dark energy do not exist. Second, it would mean that the strength of gravity is not constant, but rather varies with scale. Third, it would mean that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate due to the scale-dependent nature of gravity.
The framework model is still in its early stages of development, but it has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the universe.
176090101
submission
perpetualinput writes:
We've all seen the stunning images: two neutron stars in a cataclysmic collision, followed by artist renditions of powerful jets blasting outwards. But what if the prevailing "jet" explanation is completely wrong, and the true picture is far more elegant, governed by physics as simple as a Newton's Cradle?
Black holes have powerful gravitational poles. These poles act like the drain in your sink, creating a vortex. The rotating disk of debris, influenced by these poles, isn't being shot outwards; it's being pulled inwards, spiraling along the black hole's gravitational field lines. This inward spiral, viewed from certain angles, looks like a "jet", but it's fundamentally an inward flow after a ballistic collision.
The standard narrative paints these "jets" as some mysterious byproduct of magnetic fields and accretion disks. However, a closer look at the physics of the collision reveals two neutron stars, colliding with unimaginable energy. Just like a Newton's Cradle, the momentum transfers through the collision. Instead super-dense matter ejected perpendicular to the collision plane from both ends.
The extreme conditions in the post-merger environment could lead to the formation of highly organized structures within the ejected material. These structures, influenced by the black hole's gravity, would further enhance the spiraling inflow, creating the illusion of collimated "jets".
Similarly, if the combined mass is below the limit, the ejected material doesn't collapse into a black hole. Instead, it forms a rapidly rotating disk. Over vast timescales, this disk can evolve into a spiral galaxy. A neutron star merger can be the seed of a new galaxy. Forget the inaccuratly complex "jet" models; the simple physics of momentum transfer explains it all.
So, where does this leave the "jet" theory? This simpler, more elegant explanation not only aligns better with fundamental physics but also offers a unified framework for understanding both black hole formation and galactic genesis. It's time to rethink the prevailing paradigm and embrace the simple physics in understanding the universe's most extreme events.
176089499
submission
perpetualinput writes:
Fine Tuning of a Scale-Dependent Gravitational Framework, a new model of gravity proposed to explain the observed motions of stars in galaxies and the accelerated expansion of the universe without the need for dark matter or dark energy. The framework model, is based on the idea that the strength of gravity varies with scale, has been shown to be consistent with a variety of observations, including the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and the rotation curves of galaxies.
If the framework model is correct, it would represent a major breakthrough in our understanding of the universe. However, the framework model is still in its early stages of development and has not yet been fully tested against all available data.
How Does the Framework Model Work?
The framework model is based on the idea that the strength of gravity is not constant, but rather varies with scale. This means that gravity is stronger on small scales, such as the scale of a galaxy, and weaker on large scales, such as the scale of the universe.
The framework model also incorporates the idea that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. This accelerated expansion is thought to be caused by a mysterious force called dark energy. However, in the new model, the accelerated expansion of the universe is explained by the scale-dependent nature of gravity.
What Are the Implications of the Framework Model?
If the framework model is correct, it would have a number of important implications for our understanding of the universe. First, it would mean that dark matter and dark energy do not exist. Second, it would mean that the strength of gravity is not constant, but rather varies with scale. Third, it would mean that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate due to the scale-dependent nature of gravity.
The framework model is still in its early stages of development, but it has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the universe.
