Re:2 years is too long (Score 1)

To be fair, 2 years is probably less time than it took them to be transcribed initially. So after however many hundreds/thousands of years, we should be grateful that technology has advanced to a point where it takes 2 years instead of 10. Maybe by 2500 it will only take 1 year to transcribe them.

However I imagine it would have taken the original authors far longer to transcribe them and then also make them available globally...