The article text has been changed... (Score 2, Interesting)

...to omit Mr. Evans' daft statement that the SCO site was down after being bombarded with countless emails sent by the virus.

Here's my feedback (now a 'complaint'):

I notice that you have edited this story without acknowledgement, to remove Mr. Evan's incorrect statement that SCO's website was being bombarded by countless emails sent by the virus.

I know this because I viewed the page this morning and found it laughable that someone could draw such extreme insinuations from a situation they quite obviously have no technical grasp of. Now the article has changed but the time of last update shown at the top of the page remains at close to midnight this morning.

Is this standard journalistic practise for the BBC; to continually edit and alter published reports without acknowledgement? I consider this an abuse of your position as one of the world's largest broadcasters, and until now believed you had unblemished and unquestionable integrity. It really is sad to now be in the position where I will not take your reports seriously again.

Any repect I once had for this organisation is dripping away...