
With the el-cheapo carriers heavily advertising their cut-rate plans, how long can AT&T and Verizon keep it up? Why would anyone pay $80/month when they can get the same service from another carrier for less than $50
Because that $50 plan from T-mobile or Sprint is next to useless with their shit coverage. I ran T-mobile for 2 years, I had above 2 bars maybe once.
Nice try, verizon rep. I'm a sprint customer, and my coverage is excellent. My experience as a whole is much better than when I was on verizon and at&t before that.
See how using personal anecdotes as actual evidence is silly?
... most apps are merely a recompile (plus some minor tweaking) away from being native Wayland apps.
(emphasis mine)
Ahh.. spoken like a true project manager! The "minor tweaking" might as well be measured in magical units of time that expand and contract at will. Until you actually look at each individual app on a code level, it's almost impossible to say how much work is involved. But management sure does love to hear about how quick and easy it will be! That's generally a "minor" amount of time before they can your ass for blowing your deadlines.
Sigh, we're not talking about running X and rendering on a Wayland desktop, we're talking about running Wayland apps and rendering on a remote desktop, the way you currently can with X. The biggest single advantage of X over Windows, which the Wayland developers seem quite happy to throw away in the quest for 'The Shiny'.
Given a choice between fancier compositing effects and being able to run any program on any machine while rendering on any other machine, I'll take the latter any day.
Right, _you_ may take the latter any day, but I think Ubuntu's point is that most people will take the former. Certainly more so when you consider their target demographic and the direction they're taking the platform (tablets, netbooks, etc). It seems to me that they're aware that they're trading in some geek cred in exchange for more ubiquity and appeal to greater masses. Some of the more tech-centric, niche features of Ubuntu will certainly drop-off in exchange for visual appeal and ease-of-use to attract a greater audience.
I welcome the direction, especially considering that we geeks we still be able to easily switch to a more traditional desktop environment if we so choose.
If you don't like idle, why are you even reading this article? Seriously, it takes a special kind of stupid to be here commenting on an article then. It's like going out of your way at a buffet to grab a heaping load of beans, and then complaining about how much you hate beans and how idiotic it was for them to put the beans up on the buffet.
If I had mod points, I'd mod you up. Why people do that is beyond me. If it's so offensive, stop reading and skip to the next article!
As COO, what are you going to do to improve the products you highlighted above? I'm not looking for a soft answer like "I'm going to promote Ubuntu on netbooks" but more so an itemized list of measurable goals, with milestones, dates and areas of focus (for instance, power minded ARM distributions). Is there anything about their vision you intend to change or influence the most?
Or, to put that first part in non-douche: "Do you have any specific, tangible ideas about how to improve the products highlighted above?"
You raise a good question, but dude, come on. The way you worded it made it sound like a condescending PHB preparing for a departmental meeting.
Anyone who imagines that all fruits ripen at the same time as the strawberries, knows nothing about grapes. -- Philippus Paracelsus