Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - A Bored Chinese Housewife Spent Years Falsifying Russian History on Wikipedia (vice.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Posing as a scholar, a Chinese woman spent years writing alternative accounts of medieval Russian history on Chinese Wikipedia, conjuring imaginary states, battles, and aristocrats in one of the largest hoaxes on the open-source platform. The scam was exposed last month by Chinese novelist Yifan, who was researching for a book when he came upon an article on the Kashin silver mine. Discovered by Russian peasants in 1344, the Wikipedia entry goes, the mine engaged more than 40,000 slaves and freedmen, providing a remarkable source of wealth for the Russian principality of Tver in the 14th and 15th centuries as well as subsequent regimes. The geological composition of the soil, the structure of the mine, and even the refining process were fleshed out in detail in the entry.

Yifan thought he’d found interesting material for a novel. Little did he know he’d stumbled upon an entire fictitious world constructed by a user known as Zhemao. It was one of 206 articles she has written on Chinese Wikipedia since 2019, weaving facts into fiction in an elaborate scheme that went uncaught for years and tested the limits of crowdsourced platforms’ ability to verify information and fend off bad actors. “The content she wrote is of high quality and the entries were interconnected, creating a system that can exist on its own,” veteran Chinese Wikipedian John Yip told VICE World News. “Zhemao single-handedly invented a new way to undermine Wikipedia.”

Yifan was tipped off when he ran the silver mine story by Russian speakers and fact-checked Zhemao’s references, only to find that the pages or versions of the books she cited did not exist. People he consulted also called out her lengthy entries on ancient conflicts between Slavic states, which could not be found in Russian historical records. “They were so rich in details they put English and Russian Wikipedia to shame,” Yifan wrote on Zhihu, a Chinese site similar to Quora, where he shared his discovery last month and caused a stir. The scale of the scam came to light after a group of volunteer editors and other Wikipedians, such as Yip, combed through her past contributions to nearly 300 articles.

Comment Re:No, it's just theft (Score 1) 73

Like they do with the current banking system where there is also a layer of secrecy preventing anyone from tracking it? Bitcoin actually makes it harder to hide corruption compared with the current banking-system.

With bitcoin the whole ledger is open to everyone and the transactions can be tracked forever... On top of that you add regulation on exchanges where it could be seized. Nowhere to hide. Nowhere to run. Always traceable.

Comment Re:Quick quick! (Score -1, Troll) 353

Are you a doctor? A researcher?

Before you spew propaganda you might want to read up on the subject.
https://ivmmeta.com/

It has shown quite good efficacy, if used in early treatment, in covid-19 cases. Nothing about it says that vaccines should be ignored or discarded.

A overview of different treatments can be seen here:
https://c19early.com/

Since we have a bunch of breakthru infections of vaccinated people these treatments are still extremely important.
Maybe you should think of those that have autoimmune issues or allergies that prevent them from actually taking any of the current vaccines.

Comment Re:vandalism (Score 2) 283

Today we have Iridium and a couple of others that allow speeds of up to 9600bps for ~$100/mo where 120 minutes of internet access is quite common. Speeds usually stays around 4800bps on average. (basically just a dial-up over radio)
This oligopoly is currently being challenged by SpaceX in the short term.

To my knowledge there are at least two large competitors to SpaceX.
Samsung has it's own project where they will have an estimated ~4600 low-orbit satellites
Amazon, with it's project Kupier, that Facebook also joined have ~7800 satellites planned. They currently have FCC approval for ~3200 satellites.

So that SpaceX would have a monopoly is just false... I do think SpaceX will be the first, but they will not be the only option seen over the next 10 years.

SpaceX primary focus is not to compete in locations that already have fairly good connectivity but to take on the market where there is only dial-up or no high-speed internet.. Just consider cruise-ships, airplanes, tiny towns where it would cost millions to dig down a fiber, Remote 3g/4g base-stations in countries with minimal or no infrastructure for connectivity.

Comment Re:Nuclear waste is popular in Canada (Score 1) 335

I was referring to your statement that nuclear have higher emissions that solar and wind. I never stated that nuclear is carbon negative or neutral. I was arguing against you statement that nuclear have higher CO2 emissions than wind and solar per produced kWh.
Out of scope of the argument, but if we do consider that nuclear allows for the production of stable and abundant power and allows other industries to switch to electricity could be made into an argument that nuclear reduces CO2 emissions overall, even if the actual power-plant does not. Electric cars or electric foundries or cement-production to name a few would reduce the amount of fossil fuels that we use. Solar/Wind for foundries or cement-production not really viable due to a loss of power will result in costs of millions. But that was not the argument made, just wanted to point out a flaw in your argument and maybe introduce some new viewpoints.

One of your credible references is only about nuclear, no comparison to either wind or solar.
The second link is from a green "activist" news-source and third one is a reporter trying to make an argument against nuclear.
Only the first one is from a credible source, but that one does not compare CO2 emissions between the different technologies so does not say anything except comparing different nuclear-plant technologies against each other.

The links i referenced are studies on actual released CO2 during the whole lifetime (building, producing years and retirement). Do check the links from that article that points to the different studies that they use the data from.

The second is from the UN that published a study around nuclear-power that points out that nuclear power is the energysource that have the greatest impact, at least short term, in reducing our CO2 emissions.

So once again. Please provide references to *any* scientific journal that compares the lifetime emissions of nuclear, solar and wind. The comparison should be within a single study to make sure they calculate the construction, production years and retirement the same way. Most studies try to estimate CO2 released for concrete as an example and these estimations can differ quite a bit. Some may include CO2 released for transporting things while others may not.
This is why it's important to use a single study for comparing wind/solar/nuclear.

When considering nuclear-power we should also include that most of these reactors can be utilized quite a few years without any extra CO2 being released, and you have people fighting over shutting down our existing ones.
The Reuters article mainly considers bulding traditional nuclear-plants and does not consider variants that are more efficient and require much less material to produce. The huge cooling-towers (and containment on inner-core breach) for example are not a required on liquid salt reactors as they run at low-pressure and a breach of the core would not cause a catastrophic breach of the core that would need to be contained in such a large volume.

Even if this is a generic article it gives a brief introduction into the new technology TerraPower's reactor is using.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/1...

I do not ignore facts that are inconvenient, i read up on them and adjust my view based on what the facts say..

I do not consider opinions, like the Reuters article, as facts.

Comment Re:Nuclear waste is popular in Canada (Score 2) 335

No, it is NOT lower in CO2 emissions. Consider all the concrete that goes into a nuke plant. Making all that concrete emits a large fraction of its own weight in .... CO2.

That's before you even get into refining all the steel, etc.

Considering building, maintaining and retiring of nuclear-plants they produce less CO2 per kWh than all current alternatives. Wind and solar are close, but still not there.. Hydro releases much more CO2 than what people think.

See "Lifecycle emissions"
https://www.carbonbrief.org/so...

If we have nuclear-power we also have the possibility to run electricity-powered foundries and reduce the released CO2 even more.
If we also start by going to next-gen nuclear-plants, such as liquid salts etc, we can reduce the amount of material even more since we do not need those huge containment-vessels since there is no pressurized containment vessel that can rupture in the same way. The added benefit to a liquid salt reactor is that we could use old spent fuel-rods as a fuel-source reducing the need to dig for more fuel.. If we go with a thorium fuel'ed reactor there is even a stockpile of thorium that would last around a thousand years.

If you make electricity cheaper you can even start producing CO2 neutral fuel for cars..

Until we have working fusion-reactors (Have been 20 years away for the last 30 years) and want to reduce co2 nuclear, but next gen plants, is basically the only real answer.... Unless you consider rolling blackouts etc a viable option.

Comment Re: Trump is the greatest troll ever! (Score 3, Interesting) 375

Since when... the popular vote as of now is like Trump 47.5% and Biden 50.5... Not sure how you can that as "the rest of the country unambiguously voted him out".. The claims made by Trump do have some validity, and there is fraud in all elections..
https://www.heritage.org/voter...
The question is if the fraud was large enough to swing the election... Some claim that there might be more than 1M votes in question and that could possibly even swing the popular vote in the most extreme case....

I myself do not think the fraud was that large, but there have been some strange things happening during the election and that needs to be investigated and presented to the courts and people.

Then you have the electoral college that prevents a simple 50% majority from electing a president, and even if you do not like it it's still the law, and it's enough to flip a few of the states and not the full popular vote..

The most important thing in this election is to ensure that both sides can agree that the election was fair, even if they do not like the outcome.. If enough of either side will think the election was "stolen" it will not be fun for anyone.

Out of all elections (31) since 2000 there have been 3 cases where a "simple" recount caused the vote to flip. (fail to find the reference so do your own research)

Comment Re: Will this please go away now? (Score 1) 221

This is why we need a real study on this that brings in all the different claims of HCQ+Zinc/antibiotics and such.

India is now ramping up it's HCQ use....
https://www.indiaspend.com/ind...
https://www.indiatoday.in/indi...

I cannot understand why nobody want to do a real double-blind study on HCQ (+zinc/antibiotics and whatever else was specified) that will either prove or disprove its efficacy?!
If it works then great.. We have something cheap that works in the fight against covid-19.
If it does not work then great... We know it does not work and we can stop using it and reduce the risks of possible side-effects.

Right now nobody can say anything about it because there are no hard facts to go on at all..

Comment Re:Will this please go away now? (Score 1) 221

I don't even know where to start.. But i wish i had points.. -1 Troll...

Double-blind studies do not work like.... I hereby revoke your slashdot license and require you to go study how medical studies are performed what what rules they have to adhere to. You are welcome back when you have done this.

You do know that there are studies about HCQ and covid-19 that shows no increase in lethality.. It did not show any benefit when used alone, in the set conditions, but it did prove it to be safe.

Stop spewing your propaganda and go and learn something.

Slashdot Top Deals

I came, I saw, I deleted all your files.

Working...