ovz_kir - Slashdot User

Subject	Datestamp	Replies	Score
MS is 17 years behind...	*Wednesday March 05, 2008 @05:41PM		1
attached to Microsoft Singularity Now "Open" Source
Re:Both are good.	*Tuesday May 15, 2007 @10:16AM	1	1
Re:isolation and ease of use	*Tuesday May 15, 2007 @08:13AM		2, Informative
Re:Other way around for me	*Tuesday May 15, 2007 @08:06AM		1
Much better isolation and security? Hmm...	*Tuesday May 15, 2007 @07:52AM		3, Interesting
Re:Stop the press	*Tuesday May 15, 2007 @07:24AM		1
Re:Both are good.	*Tuesday May 15, 2007 @07:15AM	1	1
attached to Performance Evaluation of Xen Vs. OpenVZ
OS-level virtualization	*Sunday August 13, 2006 @09:49PM		1
attached to Hardware Virtualization Slower Than Software?
Re:What's virtualisation for?	*Monday August 14, 2006 @09:48AM		1
Re:What about OpenVZ?	*Monday August 14, 2006 @09:41AM		2, Informative
attached to VMware, XenSource Join Forces For Linux
Re:Virtualization != Xen	*Tuesday August 01, 2006 @05:56AM		1
attached to Xen Not Ready for Prime-time, says Red Hat
Re:no, we don't want containers	*Wednesday July 26, 2006 @08:23AM		1
Re:no, we don't want containers	*Tuesday July 25, 2006 @04:39AM	1	1
Re:no, we don't want containers	*Tuesday July 25, 2006 @01:34AM	1	2, Informative
Re:no, we don't want containers	*Monday July 24, 2006 @11:25PM	1	1
Containers	*Monday July 24, 2006 @08:00PM	1	5, Informative
attached to Extensive Coverage of Ottawa Linux Symposium 2006
Re:OpenVZ and Xen	*Tuesday June 06, 2006 @04:40PM		1
attached to User Mode Linux
Re:Yep...	*Sunday April 23, 2006 @05:37PM		1
Re:Xen misconceptions	*Sunday April 23, 2006 @05:20PM		1
Speaking of reboot...	*Sunday April 23, 2006 @05:06PM		1
Re:There is a performance cost	*Wednesday April 19, 2006 @11:54AM		1
Re:I'm not convinced...	*Wednesday April 19, 2006 @10:53AM		2, Interesting
Re:Hmmm.. Operating System	*Wednesday April 19, 2006 @10:26AM		1
Re:Virtualization is no silver bullet	*Wednesday April 19, 2006 @10:15AM		1
attached to OS Virtualization Interview