Comment He 'believes' because it got him sponsership (Score 1) 246
I was reading that a look at his history shows no belief in a flat earth until he found out he could get some funding out of it.
I was reading that a look at his history shows no belief in a flat earth until he found out he could get some funding out of it.
So his wife gets nothing because he was suicidal? I'm moving to Australia. My wife will have to treat me better.
CEO's gather around and laugh at the ones that have the most employees left. I think this is different. There is a specific drive aimed at reducing employees. That won't be done by spinning up jobs for new employees. Some work will be created for buffer companies that drive down the wages for the big guys but not to the extent that jobs are lost. Even burger flippers are targets now.
Try mid 60's like me. I've been offered indefinite contract jobs, but full time employment? I'm not working for less than people that know less than me. A security 'forensic specialist' that didn't have a clue as to what email headers were? REALLY?
If you are talking flight and rockets you need to think functional or die.
There is a reason the original jet pack was on the back. He's put a lot of effort and probably money into a design that is questionable at best. The thrusters on the legs present a problem if they start to push him heels over head. Having human joints absorbing the brunt of the forces and relying on them to provide stability in flight is just plain stupid. If there is a problem, using your hands is out. Just so many things wrong.
What I worked for at my last position has no bearing on what I'm willing to take this position for.
Color me skeptical.
My brother-in-law's brother was with the FBI and retired recently. There was a dragon fly surveillance bot on display. It was on display because it was declassified since it was already over 20 years old. The guy leading them into the building quipped, "If we had that 20 years ago can you imagine what we have today?" I actually thought of a rail gun. Some of the weapons they want us to believe are in development could already be deployed. Point I was really making, is how do we know that the failed launch wasn't brought down?
Seriously, I wondered as soon as it was listed as failed if it had been taken down to test the US of A's latest technology.
I've read the same.
Really, three strikes and you are out is straight from a game someone sat down and created out of thin air one day. Now people are basing laws on the concept? WTF?
Never call a man a fool. Borrow from him.