depends on the narrator/journalist (Score 1)

imho i think it has very much to do with the narrator of the subject wether its interesting i.e. there was a show on national geographic(cant remember its name) with alan alda which took up different subjects up like why does water lay under the sand(or vice versa) and although the questions and answers could become quite specific they were still not dull or to scientific because the narrator(alan alda) was both interested and curios bout the subject