3) Let's say that a judge buys the "IP" argument, so now the industry bod is showing how at the same time a movie was being downloaded, it was also being uploaded as well. So... how did you come via that data? To obtain such data you would have required access to data from my computer, and permission to access that has never been granted by me. That would mean an offence has been committed in collecting the "evidence", and thus it would be dismissed from the case.
Actually, #3 can be obtained from the torrent tracker, not from your computer.
By the way, there is a way to see what an IP address downloaded in the last few days: https://iknowwhatyoudownload.c...
CERN doesn't care about my opinion? How would you know that?
Well, what CERN does is not what you argue for - what better proof that you don't matter to them?
For all you know I'll be responsible for influencing the decision.
Your opinion about yourself doesn't match the reality.
CERN *should* care about me and the millions like me who are asking for reasonable justification before we commit to billions in equipment for more research.
Well, CERN doesn't manage the budgets of the participating countries, so they are only committing their own money, money received from your governments. They are free to use their money as they see fit, or you think they need your blessing?
IF they tick off enough folks like me though dismissive folks like you, it might be a long time before they get funding for their new toy.
Let me repeat myself: you don't matter. Also, your government will ignore you and pay up. They will, actually, insist on paying into the new toy, to be able to receive the goodies they new toy will discover.
I just want to do what's best here
No, you want to feel important.
advancements in areas like chemistry and biology could pay off more directly in huge ways
Faster ROI - are you an MBA, by any chance?
Once you get one level below the three base subatomic particles, there isn't much to be gained that applies to chemistry...
How do you know? See the future? Completed that research ahead of CERN?
Rarely does anything happen in the biological world that requires the huge energies of even a small collider.
[...] But we are not even close to such energies in the "natural biological world" so I simply think you are not understanding what you talk about, even at the elementary level.
First, I never said that biology happens at the levels of energy involved in a particle accelerator. Never crossed my mind, whatever you may say.
Second, you seem to consider that the energy used in the process of analyzing something must be equal to the energy used in that something's functioning. Again, it's just your assumption.
Whatever, you can consider yourself the voice of reason. Good thing CERN doesn't care about you.
Programmers do it bit by bit.