When you discover that the first several results from a search on a search engine "break", good luck letting sites "keep the pieces" while keeping some sense that search engines are still useful. Imagine performing some random web search, but you discover that the first five results on the page that look relevant are broken due to your ad blocking policy. But you don't know they're actually broken until you've already spent time viewing them. Your back button is going to get a lot of workout, and you'll spend a lot of time looking at broken pages.
For 5 pages this takes 5 or 10 seconds. Not a lot of time compared to the damage done by a compromised computer. It's like everything else in live. You can cry about all the time it takes to put on a condom or you can not get AIDS. Your choice.
Unless you have such a vague notion of faith as to make it effectively meaningless it HAS to intrude on the material plane.
Well, let's test this scientific theory of yours by asking for examples... Please, list such "intrusions"...
Is there any religion without an origin story like "turtles all the way" or "god did it in 6 days" or similar bullshit?
Since when is "dictating behavior" the domain of science?
You have to wash your hand between performing an autopsy and delivering a baby. You have to heat a chicken to 75 Celsius before eating it. You have to wear a safety belt while driving a car. You may not dump chemical waste into drinking water supply. I'm sure you're able to find millions of other examples.
It is just as silly and repugnant to use today's moral standards to judge people who lived in far different times
When they are discussed as moral role models for people today they absolutely need to be judged by today's standard. And by these standards he was just another child molesting mass murder.
Conservation of energy - the assumption that energy cannot be either destroyed or created - is a fundamental axiom in physics, which goes against the idea that there was a point in time before which the universe didn't exist, but after, it did
Emi Noether showed in the first half of the last century that conservation of energy is equivalent to time invariance ("shift symmetry of time"). At the beginning of time, i. e. the beginning of the universe, there was no time invariance; time was just being "created". Hence no conservation of energy.
Should NBC be able to air detailed plans to create a nuclear weapon? If you answer 'yes' to this, then I have to write you off as a crazy ideologue.
Isn't the real question: Should NBC be banned from airing detailed plans to create a nuclear weapon? If you think they should be banned: Who else should be banned from doing so? Universities? Why? Why not?
If you answer 'no', then you have to admit that there are limits to freedom of expression and it is just a matter of finding a consensus position.
I think they should not. There are far better ways to learn how to build a nuclear weapon than a television series; most of it is engineering and the only way to learn that is by actually designing and building stuff. Watching other people do it just doesn't cut it. A television program is therefore not required.
I'm actually not sure if there should be limits to freedom of speech. Maybe it would be better to allow all speech (even the "shouting fire in a theatre"). Hard to tell. Do you have any data to support either side of the discussion or will you only contribute some random insults?
I'd argue it was very good, that only thousands of lives were lost, instead of the millions if spycraft had failed.
John Stockwell, former CIA Station Chief in Angola in 1976, working for then Director of the CIA, George Bush estimated in 1987, 27 years ago, that over 6 million people have died in CIA covert actions. See http://www.informationclearing.... What do you think? Have they doubled their number by now?
clouded my judgement of Galileo.
Poor wording, i wanted to say that I took for granted that he was "right" without ever checking it.
If a listener nods his head when you're explaining your program, wake him up.