Comment Consider this (Score 0) 83
Simple explanation. The article does not advocate the raising of cattle for purposes of generating heat - it is simply utilizing waste that already exists. This WASTE is renewable in a manner of speaking i.e. it is the by-product of already occurring practices. Instead of sending the left-overs to a rendering facility for full homogenization, they are using the leftovers to make heat. Instead of a landfill feast for sea gulls, we can generate something useful instead of more trash. And considering that biomass that is put into the landfills, regardless of how biodegradable the material is, will sit for decades unchanged (See National Geographic's article some time back where they dug up a 15 year old clump of lettuce from a landfill that was in no significant way degraded).
The secondary benefit is that instead of the smell of burning coal down-wind from the plant, you have the smell of hamburgers :)
The secondary benefit is that instead of the smell of burning coal down-wind from the plant, you have the smell of hamburgers