What other search engine is there? There's Microsoft and Google with deep pockets. Does DuckDuckGo have fat stacks of cash sitting around for some reason? How bad would it be for Mozilla to take Facebook funding? Would we really stand for it if Moz got funding from Baidu or Yandex?
I mean, insofar as we stand for things that the Mozilla foundation does now, which are mostly terrible and stupid.
So probably Facebook then.
and obviously it's ignorant
americans are feeding crony financial parasites and getting nothing in return "because capitalism" when it's not capitalism at all
and never can be capitalism: capitalism is pretty wonderful but only works in certain economic sectors. it's not magic unicorn farts you sprinkle on anything and then everything is fixed because magic, which is unfortunately the extent of many americans' understanding of capitalism
very well said
like you see with trump in the usa
and, like trump, it's financially and politically retarded
scotland will leave, and northern ireland may, and britain will suffer a number of financial costs it has to pay now
so now britain is significantly poorer and weaker
all because some old morons don't like immigrants
the real issue is why these people are so angry, and the obvious answer is they feel poor while they perceive immigrants as coddled
and they are poor... because of plutocratic abuses, not immigrants
plutocratic abuses the political *left* has answers to
but the old morons reject the left for various stupid and propagandistic reasons
like americans rejecting universal healthcare, even though it's far cheaper and equal or higher quality. because "capitalism." when it's just cronyism
old poor morons like plutocrats to have gold toilets i guess, and are too fucking stupid to see how or why that's all their uneducated opinions lead to
That is true. I haven't. I don't. I do have Google Voice configured to deliver SMS messages as email (and I whitelist senders to a minimum as well), precisely because I don't want to deal with another, extremely limited messaging tool. I already dislike the idea that I need accounts on six or seven different platforms to communicate with my contacts. Why add another to the list?
Yes, because we need another, even less convenient way to send a message containing some combination of unicode text and binary data from one device to another, like we don't already have Email or a bajillion other IM clients. SMS is lame enough. Fancy, fruit-exclusive SMS is better how, exactly?
Is that the IBM employee who was whining about it on Reddit? Instead of, I don't know, an official IBM channel?
You realize that if you're using RAID5 for a volume larger than about 12TB, you're going to run in to the mathematical certainty that you'll have a read error during data a rebuild operation, right? It's not a huge deal if you're under that threshold, but I've found 20TB+ RAID5s in production systems a few times and I think it's something a lot of folks don't know about.
The issue has to do with the rated hard error rate for mechanical drives, making an uncorrectable read error a statistical certainty at around 12TB for RAID5 and 30somethingTB for RAID6.
Apple has never offered an idevice with removable storage. It didn't abandon the concept. It has actively refused to participate in the first place.
Lightning has been integrated into Thunderbird for some time now.
Palemoon is a thing that exists. If you're a Windows user, it's clearly the best way forward for those seeking refuge from Mozilla's mismanagement.
I'm not sure what Thunderbird needs. As far as I can tell, it's fine. It's not buggy and all the features I want to use work. Other than security fixes, what more do I want out of a mature mail client?
I don't agree with Steam's terms of service. I paid for the games. They're mine. I should be able to reinstall them at whim, with or without internet access. With or without Valve's involvement. If Valve decides I'm a dick, I should be able to continue playing games, not have my access to them terminated because of their user agreement. I especially dislike the notion that I have to check-in with an online service to play single player, offline titles. All of that is unacceptable. Just because you're willing to compromise on those things doesn't mean that I am or that I should have to.
Because I'd rather support a company whose policies I encourage than give my business to someone who can hold other purchases hostage. When I can play my legally obtained copy of Half-Life 2 without having Steam installed, I'll think about whether or not there's a practical difference. Until then, there definitely is.
On a related note, I won't buy games on Steam (or Origin, same difference), because I don't like its terms of service. I've also felt the sting of losing a beloved MMO to corporate mismanagement and I'm not doing THAT again either. That almost completely shuts me out of PC gaming.
Android games can be coped and played elsewhere, but some titles require either Google or Amazon authentication to operate and thus aren't truly portable either. It's better, in that I don't think Amazon and Google are going anywhere, but I actually had a functional Android game (Xcom: Enemy Within) pulled from my Amazon library so I can't play it any more, which speaks to my wider objection to Steam and Origin as well.
That pretty much leaves me with GoG and handheld systems (ew) for new games. It's just not a good time to be a gamer, IMO.
Truth is free, but information costs.