Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Well...China's right on this one (Score 0) 165

Are you a member of the ? Your comment is so laughable. Google is not anti-China; if anything it is anti Chinese government, which is a bunch of corrupt exploiters and killers. China has laws? HaHaHaHa! The only law in China is the party itself. China has laws that nobody follows, it is all a facade. If you live in China or are Chinese, you know that's true. If you don't, well, then you don't know shit.

Comment Re:what americans are forgetting (Score 0) 84

The question is, what law has google violated? They just added a redirect from google.cn to google.hk. What's wrong with doing a redirect, which is done by thousands of websites? Why is it ok that I type google.hk and see it but not ok if it is done automatically? Which is the "local regulation" that specifies that? The answer is, there is not. And the answer is in China law is the same as government. There is not a set of rules we all play with, equally (well, there are, but they don't matter). The government decides what is acceptable and what not, and they don't even need to explain you way. And they don't.
Google

Google Has Android Remote App Install Power, Too 278

Trailrunner7 writes "The remote-wipe capability that Google recently invoked to remove a harmless application from some Android phones isn't the only remote control feature that the company built into its mobile OS. It turns out that Android also includes a feature that enables Google to remotely install apps on users' phones as well. Jon Oberheide, the security researcher who developed the application that Google remotely removed from Android phones, noticed during his research that the Android OS includes a feature called INSTALL_ASSET that allows Google to remotely install applications on users' phones. 'I don't know what design decision they based that on. Maybe they just figured since they had the removal mechanism, it's easy to have the install mechanism too,' Oberheide said in an interview. 'I don't know if they've used it yet.'"
Advertising

Website Mass-Bans Users Who Mention AdBlock 660

An anonymous reader writes to recommend TechDirt's take on the dustup over at the Escapist, which recently tried on banning users from their forums for the mere mention of AdBlock. In the thread in which the trouble started, a user complained that an ad for Time Warner Cable was slowing down his computer. Users who responded to the poster by suggesting "get Firefox and AdBlock" found themselves banned from the forums. The banned parties didn't even need to admit they used AdBlock, they simply had to recommend it as a solution to a troublesome ad. The forum's recently amended posting guidelines do indeed confirm that the folks at the Escapist believe that giving browsing preference advice is a "non forgivable" offense. After a lot of user protest, the forum unbanned the transgressors but heaped on the guilt.
Software

Submission + - Nissan turns to high-tech to stop drink driving

StonyandCher writes: As part of its drive to reduce road deaths and injuries, Nissan Motor has installed in a car three prototype high-tech systems designed to stop drink driving.

The first attempts to directly detect alcohol in the driver's sweat and gear shift lever. A second system in the car uses a camera mounted in front of the driver to monitor eye movement. If the driver is drowsy it triggers the seat belt to tighten and this movement will hopefully snap the driver out of their drowsiness or prompt them to take a rest. A third system monitors the path of the vehicle to ensure it's traveling in a straight line and not weaving about the road, as is common with a drunken driver.

Slashdot Top Deals

The wages of sin are unreported.

Working...