Yes they do. Its called the Earth.

I could tell you, but I'd have to kill you.

Because the car metaphor was meant to be humor not literal. If you want to actually learn something, then read the gfs paper. Being a former googler, I can tell you first hand that gfs is truly unique. Consider for a minute that the google infrastructure is designed to run like a single system. When something breaks in California, systems in Ireland know about it and adjust things automatically until things are fixed in Cali. EXT3, NTFS, XFS, and even the new BTrFS can't do that.

If you want to show off your amazing talent of being the net's largest tool, then just tack on another lame comment to the 1st commenter above.

Because Google employs experienced, quality developers who would rather see something functional versus something that a bunch of flashing lights and shiny outer layer.

I second, third, and fourth that ... !!

My Side? As if I am the only one on this article that commented about Palin. Pfft. Go piss n moan to someone who gives a fuck. Try here http://www.republicanoperative.com/ they'll give you all the sympathy you need.

Let us not forget that there are only 6 continents on Palin's map of the earth. Africa is apparently of no concern to this dimwit. Could you imagine her first argument for a piece of legislature she would have pushed, "Why? Because I want to, that's why!"

You are a fool if you believe that Ballmer is a experienced business man. He is loud, obnoxious, and has created zero "big ideas" for the company. Ass Kissing is probably a skill he is good at, but now that he is CEO and Bill is gone ... what else is there?

Ballmer is so obnoxious, that he's not. Does he really believe that this shift in sales will last? It goes back and forth so much, that bragging about the small period where PC's may be ahead makes Ballmer the World's Biggest and most Useless TOol!! Have I ever told you about the time I beat Ballmer in a arm wrestling match?

Exactly my point. Thank-you!

Please. I work for Motorola AirDefense and our products are much more developed, much more thorough, and higher rated in the industry. Considering that Cisco *BOUGHT* Aironet, they did not create it and they certainly have not improved it. They tried to partner with us and we turned them down, because they admitted up front what they intended to do with us. They should just stick with what they know, what has got them this far. 7 vulnerabilities in the past 2 months on their Wireless Management products proves that they do not have what it takes to cut it in the Wireless market.

Personal experience is the only citation I have. Don't be blinded because you happen to use the products that they do well (i.e. Infrastructure and Backbone). But when it comes to R&D in other arena they severely lack what it takes due to their over-inflated ego. Have you ever dealt directly with a Cisco Sales rep?

I'm definitely not flying anymore. Its bad enough the good pilots are landing on water these days, but a 'tarded pilot might come back and strike up random conversations with the passengers while she is supposed to be landing the plane.

They'll fail at this, like they failed in Wireless Security. Cisco should stick to what they know, network infrastructure and backbone support. They suck at everything else.

Your signature has absolutely no truth to it whatsoever. Its highly opinionated and stands to spread right-winged propaganda. When will you get it, change starts with the individual.