The experiment is probably involving a resonating mass, which is tuned to the packet frequency of the LHC. With 2800 packets making one cycle per 90ms, this gives a frequency of about 3 * 10^7 Hz. If the resonator is of sufficient quality, we might get (I am guessing) 10^9 impulses before the oscillation is damped significantly. This amounts to a maximum velocity of the oscillator of 3 * 10^-9 m/s^2 * 2 * 10^-9 s * 10^9 = 6 * 10^-9 m/s. Assuming a harmonic oscillator, that's a displacement of 6 * 10^-9 m/s
This effect is minuscle, but it might be just at the limit of dectability. A significant problem will be the shielding of the detector, because the LHC should generate a lof of 3 * 10^7 Hz noise, which would influence the experiment. Maybe it would pay to use a higher frequency resonator, despite the smaller displacement.
The problem with GWT is that it mixes so badly with other web toolkits. And it is not standardized, being neither fully Java nor JavaScript at all.
If you want to work in a class-oriented fashion for web development, you should probably go the way of JavaScript 2 as implemented by Jangaroo or Mascara. While JavaScript 2 is not finalized yet, we have a good idea of how it must be like from looking at ActionScript 3.
I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning. -- Plato