2. I would be more in support of a flat income tax (@10%) or a consumption tax (@20%).
Back in 2016 many of the GOP candidates suggested a flat income tax. None of them came close to balancing a budget. The closest was Santorum, with about 100 million dollars deficit per year. He suggested a 20% flat income tax. In the United Kingdom they have a 20% consumption tax, if you want to call it that. However, in order to make 20% feasible, it needs to be a 20% VAT, which generally translates to higher costs to consumers as business don't particularly like to eat their VAT when they can pass it on. Probably the most well known example of a flat AND consumption tax country is Russia. Their taxes are confusing to me, tho. They pay a flat 13% income tax, but then there are other taxes (just like here). However, I think that one of them is an approximately 26% social security tax. Their "consumption tax" is 20%.
same goes for all DOE, DOD and DHS expenditures into science, those are all expenditures for research into weapons/defense spending.
When I was in undergraduate our high energy physics lab was funded primarily by DoE funds. We did research on particle decay rates with data from the LHC and SLAC. That fundamental science is now used in radiological sciences for the treatment of cancer.
"There are some good people in it, but the orchestra as a whole is equivalent to a gang bent on destruction." -- John Cage, composer