That's true. Now AI of course is certainly not new tech. It has been widely used since at least the '70s. I personally have been using it since the '90s, and my brain isn't fried yet...

That is true, but you also have to consider that there are many different countries, with different sets of laws. Whatever is the law in the US is not universal law, nor eternal law.

Of course, nobody should use systemd at all, for a plethora of other reasons, but if you do want to use it s fork has been created without age verification: https://itsfoss.com/news/syste...

That is obviously nonsense though. Anyone believing this because it comes from a university professor should be on Reddit, not here.

$ uptime
> 22:35:16 up 561 days, 15:16, 1 user, load average: 2,79, 2,96, 3,04

Money, obviously. After the dead of Christopher Tolkien, the Tolkien estate has taken to IP-mining to a degree that Disney would be ashamed of.

"From a truly integrated voice experience to proactive maintenance reminders, your car will become a true extension of your digital life," Sounds like dystopian horror to me.

I realise these are just a few mock-ups, but it looks like the approach here was to use as much screen space for as little as possible.

...is this really newsworthy? (Also, LibreOffice does support the proprietary 'x' formats; that is a stupid reason to chose Microslop Office)

Yes, but now the user interface will look more like tiktok. Isn't that what the users want?

From the Mozilla help pages: "The AI Controls settings panel does not include features that use traditional machine learning, such as systems that classify, rank, or personalize an experience." So clearly, these controls do not block *all* artificial intelligence features. I also didn't expect they would (among other reasons because they don't have a coherent definition of what exactly is or is not an AI feature), but advertising it like this is still misleading.

Two philosophers in 1998 said so. Clearly, that must mean it is true... I think the more likely explanation is that Elana Klein has lost her mind (as much mind as a Wired writer could have).

There are two possible explanation for this: either the people who wrote this don't know what crucial technologies actually are, or they don't know anything about the real state of research.

The next question will be: are those large corporation going to be quick enough in realising the pendulum has reached the end of its swing, and will they be agile enough to adapt to it before going it's to late to change course?

This seems like a clear case of Goodhart's law.