biased view (Score 1)

all the MSNBC article looks at is games for the current systems. Go back to the last generation of systems, specifically the playstation, you will find a multitude of games that are far worse than any stated there. Most of this would be due to development time, and also price, users would be less likely to buy something bad for a system that cost them an arm and 3 legs (ie. xbox) than they would for their trusty psx. When you read this don't just nod your head, have a look at your own collection of psx games, if you don't have a ratio of 1 good game to every 3-5 bad ones you've never been to indonesia and had 50c games at your fingertips.