Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment ChatGPT vs Anthropic (Score 1) 93

Just yesterday I created a Clause Pro account to test a simple coding project I'm working on. This move was partly in response to my respect for Anthropic showing some moral backbone.

I was also having small issues coding with ChatGPT. I say small, because what it CAN accomplish is pretty remarkable. I found it awkward to work by cutting and pasting code sections, however, and over the course of long conversations I noticed the LLM was not retaining the full context of what had been done before. I imagine there are probably better ways to code with ChatGPT, but for such occasional use I've just been making do.

I was particularly interested in giving Clause Code direct access to my files, because I am lazy and find it so much faster to have the changes applied directly. Claude looked through my files, and then was ready to add a new feature I wanted. The feature was to add a table to a web form, with buttons to add or delete entries to the table. It worked, but kept creating an unnecessary blank row at the bottom. Claude rewrote things 3 times and the issue was still occurring. I switched the model from Sonnet 4.6 to Opus 4.6 and tried again. Still not fixed.

This is my first use of Claude, and I suppose it's possible that I picked a subtle problem to test it on, or maybe it would have done better if the code was entirely written by Claude instead of taken over from ChatGPT. Anyway, I'm going to try solving it with ChatGPT and see if it does better.

Comment Re:Insider trading markets (Score 1) 30

There are two types of people there. Inside traders and suckers.

This is modded funny, but it's actually the truth. Many years ago my wife had an attractive female friend with a penchant for dating well-to-do men. Several of these were well-known players in a particular stock market. I distinctly remember one occasion where she was explicitly told that a stock was going to rise dramatically on a certain date, and that she would do well to invest beforehand. She shared this information with family members, and they profited handsomely. I realized at that moment that anyone gambling on the stock market without insider information was indeed a sucker.

Comment Re:Why not just render the PDF as an image? (Score 1) 61

Why not just render the PDF as an image and then process the image just like AI already can do?

I don't see the challenge, here.

My thoughts exactly. I routinely paste images into ChatGPT that it parses quite well, at least in terms of text they contain. For things like error messages that pop-up on a computer, I don't even type any context and get (mostly) useful interpretations.

Comment Re:Disclosure Process (Score 1) 73

Yes, there is a semi-secret mailing list of organizations that are informed of CVEs before public disclosure.

It's called responsible disclosure, and security researchers have done this since the last century. When a vulnerability is discovered, the software's maintainers are given advance notice to develop a patch before the vulnerability is made public. I'm not aware that there's any master list of entities that get notified about every vulnerability whether it belongs to them or not.

Submission + - Poll Suggestion 2

nuckfuts writes: I would be interested in a poll that asks: If you could change one thing about the Constitution of the United States, what would it be? (1) Citizenship Requirements, (2) Supreme Court Structure, (3) Electoral System, (4) Executive Branch Powers?

Comment Re:It was just a matter of time (Score 3, Insightful) 27

Linux malware is relatively rare, because getting into Linus systems is much harder than the laughably easy ways to get into Windows systems.

This is a myth. Linux malware is less common because it's a less valuable target than the more ubiquitous Windows systems.

If you want an OS that is intrinsically more secure, try OpenBSD. Their proactive auditing is second-to-none, and has been known to patch bugs before they were discovered to be exploitable.

Comment USB-C Cable Always Not Easy (Score 1) 89

Attach to a docking station with a USB-C cable - easy.

Not so easy as one might hope. There was a time when docking stations used proprietary connectors, and while not "universal", they worked extremely well.

Since manufacturers have switched to USB-C, it's become a crapshoot. This is because USB-C defines the physical connection, not the protocol. That USB connector on your laptop might be USB 3.2, USB 4, Thunderbolt, or one of several other possibilities. In my experience with so-called "universal" docking stations, the results are just as varied. Sometimes everything works except dual monitors. Sometimes everything works except the USB-A ports. Sometimes everything works except charging. I've even seen different behaviour with the same docking station swapped between "identical" laptops. (Same model, operating system, and BIOS).

Slashdot Top Deals

"Everybody is talking about the weather but nobody does anything about it." -- Mark Twain

Working...