Comment contributing factor: (Score 1) 100
Lazy studios pumping out comic book movies.
Lazy studios pumping out comic book movies.
Bloomberg Limited Partnership makes most of its money from Bloomberg Terminals...
This Roku advertisement is paywalled by the privately held Bloomberg Limited Partnership.
If you tell police your car was stolen AND tell them where it's at right now, rarely will they do anything about it. American police are generally lazy and useless and will do anything they can to avoid their duties.
In America, the Police are locally operated and they mostly protect property. Stolen cars are one of the things they take more seriously, unless you're in an overworked city during the Kia Challenge.
"Tesla officially included for the first time: Tesla is included in the industry VDS calculation this year for the first time, with a score of 242 PP100. However, because Tesla does not allow J.D. Power access to owner information in the states where that permission is required by law, Tesla vehicles remain ineligible for awards."
The corruption is everywhere in America.
How is that post trolling when this Hyundai press release is clearly related to getting people's attention off of the Kia Challenge related bad press that affects Hyundai and Kia vehicles?
This is designed to get people talking about Hyundai and anything other than their ignition debacle.
What are the odds that the shows are going to suffer and people won't want to play most of these games?
This is what CEO's are supposed to say.
I thought people weren't supposed to be "disappeared" in Western democracies. Preventing that includes easy access to unaltered police communications.
Could make for a funny prank.
"We've found no reason why client-side scanning techniques cannot be implemented safely..."
Well, that certainly reassures me.
This response makes it seem as though you are not completely familiar with the way data was collected, shared, and processed.
One group says "Hello, I am a political campaign and I have some questions for you that we will use in a political manner." As long as they uphold what they said they would do, this is fairly straightforward. This is apparently what the Obama campaign ended up doing.
While another group says "Hello, I am one of the most trusted names on Earth in academia and this is a fun time quiz." As long as they uphold what they said they would do, this is also fairly straightforward. Except that what they said was not true at all and the information collected was used in a completely different manner than described. This is apparently what Cambridge Analytica did when it worked with the Trump campaign.
These are the same to you?
That argument, that Obama in 2008 did the same thing Trump did in 2016, is from Steve Bannon, former Trump campaign manager who might be more than a little biased.
The Obama campaign collected their data from their official app and did so within Facebook's Terms of Service. People who interacted with the Obama campaign knew they were interacting with the Obama campaign.
Cambridge Analytica is believed to have violated these terms and the Trump campaign is believed to have shared their data with other parties. Their Facebook survey claimed to be from Cambridge University- it wasn't. Users were never informed that their data would be sold all over and used to model their thought processes.
So no, it was not the "EXACT" same thing...
"It ain't so much the things we don't know that get us in trouble. It's the things we know that ain't so." -- Artemus Ward aka Charles Farrar Brown