"Fahrenheit also has more descriptive power due to smaller degrees"

Maybe so, but can you tell the difference between 72 F and 74 F? I highly doubt it, and that is a larger difference than one degree Celsius. Anything that needs more precision than that can use decimals.
100 F being "pretty hot" and 0 F being "pretty cold" doesn't really help anyone too much, whereas 100 C being, "don't go outside because you'll boil to death", or 0 C being "it could snow at this temperature", seems like a much better arrangement.

No one should ever need to use Fahrenheit, or god forbid, Rankin, which is even worse, and I am of the opinion that Fahrenheit and Rankin should not exist, and therefore no one will need to use them interchangeably. Same goes for the imperial measurement system. It also does not allow "more descriptive power", since it can only be subdivided by multiples of 8, or 12, or whatever you felt like at the time before it just gets ridiculous.

That's the stupidest password I've ever heard in my life! The kind of thing an idiot would have on his luggage!

Great video. But at least one of the cars was driving on the wrong side of the road.

The girls and the first car they hit were both driving on the left, but the third car was driving on the right hand side of the road. Also, he had to be at least a few hundred metres out when the crash first occurred. That driver must have been texting too.

All nice and well, but that's still not understanding women. You just have the operators manual. It's similar to knowing how to drive a car, or knowing that you can run. Most people can (somewhat) drive, but they probably couldn't tell you how it worked. They can give you an explanation like "the gas goes through the pipes to the engine and then it goes vroom!", but they won't understand how it works. It just does; much like your explanation on how you understand women. You don't. You simply know how to push the buttons in the right way to get them to do what you want.

Women.

and 3 more full of porn.

I realize you didn't RTFA, but you could have read the fucking summary at the very least. Your complaints are based solely off of the headline.

"An answer between the most and least popular" depends on whether "most popular" refers to the option of most popular or the option with the most votes. Being ambiguous, you could decide whichever one makes you right (the latter), however, being a dick and having voted for the least popular, I'm going to decide that it's the former option, and that everyone's wrong.

"considering the very high melting point of gold"
Gold has one of the lowest melting points of all metals. Just over 1000 degrees Celsius. Clearly this is still very hot, but something as easy to find as a charcoal or natural gas can reach this temperature. A blowtorch is even hotter.
Now, I'm not sure how tight the security is around these things, but if you wear a ski mask, that could possibly be enough, and as long as you're not doing anything suspicious to the machine, very few people will pay you mind.

well, yes and no. when the police look at something, it either has to be in plain sight, or they need a warrant for it to be admissible in court. something similar /should/ apply to regular people too, so, if the photos were just there, then it's fine, but if they were in an envelope, he'd need a valid reason for actually looking through the guys stuff and finding it.

unless they were in a file folder, clearly labelled "Installer Files", or another inconspicuous name. Then the pocket installer would have to open up the folder to check what was in them, and not have simply seen them as he installed the pocket.

1/3 of 9/11 eh?

= 3/11 ~ 0.272727272727

nowhere near 1000.

Why is there even a need to reduce/eliminate lightning in the first place? from what I can find, there's an average of 90 lightning related deaths per year in the USA, which is not very much at all. There seems to be no reasonable explanation on why lightning needs to be stopped. Seems the resources could be better spent preventing other things.