This study is literally survivorship bias, serious genetic defects in reproductive cells prevent them from forming a viable fetus in the first place.

We're at 49k deaths, the 42k number is 2 days old. It's a fantastically optimistic projection to say only 66k people will die in the US, it'll be more than that in a week.

Nobody has 100k to sink into a retirement account at 18, it's all loans.

If you think the nazis were leftist you might want to check your political compass.

You're presenting evidence of atmospheric CO2 being the primary cause of climate change. Nights are warmer than in the past because the temperature difference between night and day is determined by the rate at which heat radiates into space through the atmosphere. CO2, being a greenhouse gas, causes the atmosphere to retain more heat. As CO2 concentrations increase we'd expect nighttime temperatures to become closer to daytime temperatures. You're also arguing that this will cause less extreme climate, which is false. The jet streams weakening has caused massive unseasonable temperature swings world wide, because that cool, polar air is no longer staying at high latitudes. Less cyclonic energy means less momentum and predictability in the system, it's not a good thing.

The ideal temperature is one where rainfall patterns continue to support our current population distribution, and where coastlines don't shift over decades as the sea level rises. It's whatever temperature allows our civilization to continue to thrive.

Trump used taxpayer money to extort a foreign country into investigating his political rivals. Sound better?

The funding was delayed until news about the delay and Trump's motives behind it became public. That's just withholding until you get caught. If Trump's motives were legal, why would he release the money at all? It's just throwing away leverage.

Quarterly profit is prone to swings because it's revenue minus expenses. A change of 28% is completely meaningless, it's a rounding error as far as Amazon's balance sheet is concerned. Expenses went up because of a new initiative, if revenue went down then there would be something to talk about.

Can we believe in measurements at all? Observations are inherently limited by the brain's interpretation of reality, ergo making observations and attempting to predict future results is inherently biased by forces out of our control.

Is the 737-Max flyable without MCAS? I would bet that the primary reason for the system wasn't to keep the plane like a base 737, but it keep it in the air at all. Once you've designed a huge hidden software override you might as well program it to behave like existing air frames, the regulatory rubber stamping is just a bonus.

Why did you honor a 3 month notice period for a company that treats you like garbage?

It sounds like you're contributing to this trend by being too repulsive to date.

Citing a 5 year old article because 2014 was the last year that data supported your argument just highlights how weak it is. In 2019, sea ice is hitting record lows. https://nsidc.org/arcticseaice...

No, there aren't. Everywhere on the planet is an ecosystem of some sort, the only difference is that some places get better legal representation than others.