Comment Re:wasn't it already dead? (Score 1) 313
Steve Jobs had declared it brain dead a few years ago. But Adobe finally pull the plug.
Comment Re:Be careful (Score 1) 41
Browsing the source, I don't see code for bink nor mss. What is there is the header file to link to library for bink and mss.
http://code.google.com/p/darkreign2/source/browse/source/3rdparty/#3rdparty%2Fmss
Comment Re:Huh (Score 2) 163
Just because you were doing it, you didn't patent it. And you have nothing published to claim prior art.
Comment Cost to watch my own content (Score 1) 247
If I store my content in the cloud, who pays for my bandwidth when my kid wants to watch "Bamba" every night before bed?
Comment Re:Breaking the Law (Score 2) 434
I am not saying he should turn over his password, is the term and conditions of social website the law?
Comment Re:Students and inmates now have a lot in common (Score 1) 515
Placing fines on the parents is not a solution also. If parent drags the child to school in the morning and place that child in the classroom, what is stopping that child from leaving the school grounds? Some kids don't care about authority and their parents. If you fine the parent and they cannot paid it goes on their credit report. What good is that? Children that deems their parents to be unfit can petition court for emancipation. What parents should do that have children that won't listen should petition the court to have the child declared emancipated. After all isn't that what the child wants? To be declared an adult and do as he please?
Comment Re:And no backup? (Score 1) 234
They probably never tested their backup recovery process.
Simpler "Hello World" Demonstrated In C 582
An anonymous reader writes "Wondering where all that bloat comes from, causing even the classic 'Hello world' to weigh in at 11 KB? An MIT programmer decided to make a Linux C program so simple, she could explain every byte of the assembly. She found that gcc was including libc even when you don't ask for it. The blog shows how to compile a much simpler 'Hello world,' using no libraries at all. This takes me back to the days of programming bare-metal on DOS!"
Submission + - DoJ sides with RIAA on damages in Capitol v Thomas (arstechnica.com)
Alberto G writes: As Jammie Thomas appeals the $222,000 copyright infringement verdict against her, the Department of Justice has weighed in on a central facet of her appeal: whether the $9,250-per-song damages were unconstitutionally excessive and violated the Due Process Clause of the Constitution. The DoJ says that there's nothing wrong with the figure the jury arrived at: '[G]iven the findings of copyright infringement in this case, the damages awarded under the Copyright Act's statutory damages provision did not violate the Due Process Clause; they were not "so severe and oppressive as to be wholly disproportioned to the offense or obviously unreasonable."' The DoJ also appears to be impressed with the RIAA's argument that making a file available on a P2P network constitutes copyright infringement. 'It's also impossible for the true damages to be calculated, according to the brief, because it's unknown how many other users accessed the files in the KaZaA share in question and committed further acts of copyright infringement.'
Submission + - "Viacom hit me for infringing my own copyright (blogspot.com) 2
Chris Knight writes: "Long story short: I ran for school board where I live this past fall and created some TV commercials including this one with a "Star Wars" theme. A few months ago VH1 grabbed the commercial from YouTube and featured it in a segment of its show "Web Junk 2.0". Neither VH1 or its parent company Viacom told me they were doing this or asked my permission to use it, but I didn't mind it if they did. It was great to see the commercial was being enjoyed by a far wider audience than I'd expected. I was honored that they chose to use it and thought that Aries Spears's commentary about it was pretty hilarious, so I posted a clip of VH1's segment on YouTube so that I could put it on my blog. This morning I got an e-mail from YouTube saying that the video has been pulled because Viacom is claiming that I'm violating its copyright. Viacom used my video without permission on their commercial television show, and now says that I am infringing on THEIR copyright for showing the clip of the work that Viacom made in violation of my own copyright! Talk about chutzpah! Needless to say, I would like to fight this: not for any kind of monetary compensation, but just for the right to employ my own self-created material per Fair Use."
