Re:*Please* RTFA (Score 1)

The House already approved a standalone version of the Real ID bill.

And? That, put simply, means nothing. I suggest you do some basic review of the structure your government's legislative branch before arguing that point further.

I didn't say they did [belong with a supplemental military spending bill]. And a lot of things don't belong in a lot of bills. Next?

So, something ceases to be unethical just because it is commonplace? That says a lot about the nature of your moral character.

The House already had overwhelming support for the standalone bill, and there is no reason to believe it would not have passed in the Senate as well.

And how did you arrive at that conclusion? RTFA! On the contrary, it was expected to run into problems in the Senate -- that's why it was tacked on to an emergency military spending bill in the first place.

And it still likely would have passed.

And what is that opinion based on, besides a marriage of arrogance and ignorance? And don't give that line, 'it was passed in the House' -- it makes you look like a fool, as if you were ignorant of not only the purpose of a bicameral legislature, but even of the existence of a bicameral legislature.

Learn something about your nation's government before entering a political discussion. It helps.