Comment no (Score 1) 71
No, it won't be anything of the sort. Because bureaucracy never dies and that goes for all of Europe, too.
No, it won't be anything of the sort. Because bureaucracy never dies and that goes for all of Europe, too.
^ That is a major "no shit" statement right there. It really took me a while to learn this.
I don't think Wi-Fi drivers for RPi 4 or RPi 5 will ever be supported by AARCH64 FreeBSD. Every time I look into this I get a NIMBY vibe from the FreeBSD devs. They just don't care about something that small.
What's astonishing to me is that FreeBSD, after all of this time, still does not have an additional part included in their installer to install and test Xorg and say, XFCE or GNOME desktop environments. That right there just seems to be "in error" and does not sit well with me. Sure, I could use Ghost BSD or something else. It does beg the question: why does FreeBSD do this to their whole base? Do they enjoy making the non-server crowds who run FreeBSD on their PC's and laptops miserable?
A few years ago I tried to use an older version of FreeBSD on a RPi 4 but the OS didn't have Wi-Fi support for Pi boards. Has the status for this changed with AArch64/ARM64?
In other words, would you know if they got it working and this page is now out of date, or is Wi-Fi still unsupported?
ok thanks for clarifying that. That makes more sense now.
This is dumb. Where are our clean, safe cores? Why are there always compromises with chip and software security? Why can't Intel stay ahead of the curve?
He was also working with 98 year old Henry Kissinger on that AI book. Schmidt learned a few tricks from the conniving Kissinger.
I don't see a problem with it. All people who work need to be paid a living wage, like yesterday.
I'm in Oregon. I used to toke (smoke weed) quite often back in the day before recreational marijuana became legal here. I see this not so much as a commercial control issue but more people putting on their blinders. There is still a stigma among the generations about habitual drug use. There are those who do it and those who don't partake. When you step over that line you essentially become a different person and different scenarios in perception and counter-cultural aspects when dealing with others frequently emerge.
I don't know if Big Pharma will ever get in the business of selling LSD or other narcotics. (Remember Marinol? I think that was a flop for Merck.) The pharmaceutical companies don't know what to do with the counter-cultural eccentricities of consumers in legal states who tend to be unpredictable at times in their buying habits. Sure those companies can make a buck selling a deliverable but consumers are always demanding something better. With weed, consumers in legal states want "high grade" or very potent marijuana to be sold in dispensaries. Anything that isn't truly "dank" is left by the wayside. How would Big Pharma manufacture unadulterated narcotics if they could?
Could be SigInt or some other buffoonery? William Casey was Reagan's CIA director in 1981. That was after the Church committee intelligence reforms. Casey was a real ass. They're the whole reason the Iran-Contra scandal got underway.
Machines take me by surprise with great frequency. - Alan Turing