Comment Re:moo (Score 1) 9
Journal Journal: Farewell, part II :-( 9
It seems right to post this here, where it all started. Farewell, ~jawtheshark.
Comment Re:no title (Score 1) 4
Journal Journal: Farewell :-( 4
It seems right to post this here, where it all started. Farewell, ~talinom.
Comment Under .50 per gigabyte? (Score 4, Insightful) 108
Comment Re:Take back Slashdot (Score 1) 1310
It has indeed been around for a long time. Some years much, much better than others. Unfortunately, over time, things got much less subtle, and far too repetitive.
Comment Re: "SJW" (Score 1) 398
Shut up, Toby.
His name is Kunte Kinte.
Comment Re:No... Its a smoking gun. (Score 1) 305
I hold out hope that the two of them are getting air time not because they could win, but because they are more interesting than Clinton v. Bush. Plenty of time for that boring crap later.
Comment Re:Make vendors and providers liable for defects (Score 1) 36
Vendors cannot be held responsible for stupid (or non-existent) engineering and policy.
Comment Re:The problem is systemic (Score 1) 36
Without knowing the GS/contractor divide at OPM, it's hard to say who is ultimately to blame. If OPM gave carte blanche to the contractor, the latter is generally the one at fault. If the government micro managed the contract and ignored suggestions, the blame is back with them.
Comment Re:No... Its a smoking gun. (Score 1) 305
Jim Webb doesn't strike me as particularly interested in the office.
Comment Re:Who, The Donald? (Score 1) 43
That Goldwater girl was never liberal enough to want it.
Comment Re:WoW? (Score 1) 277
Comment Re: Why isn't this illegal again? (Score 1) 614
Well the bureaucrats who are likely regulating this are probably overworked and understaffed. So it's unlikely they can effectively regulate it.
If they don't have enough people to help, maybe they should consider some H1B's to augment the staff?