For starters, the following exerpt is straight from the US Copyright Office ( copyright.gov )
" Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances.
Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses—such
as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research—as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use. "
I would like to put additional emphasis on: " TEACHING and RESEARCH " specifically.
That said, unless we start hearing music clones that sound far too similar to existing works ( which people already do, they're called samples ) I don't see
where this lawsuit has any merit whatsoever outside of a copyright troll doing their thing trying to make a quick buck.
The problem is, they're not going after some nobody who downloaded a song off of whatever is the modern day version of Napster or Pirate Bay.
They decided they're going after the folks who have so much money at their disposal they can hire an entire ARMY of lawyers.
Not only that, but since these systems are operating with the blessing of the US Government. ( Can't let China win, National Security, etc, etc. )
So you're going up against an Alpha Gorilla here.
This should be amusing to watch the Music Industry get slapped around for a while.
It's fun to watch the bullies get their asses kicked from time to time. :D
In a related note, this really needed to happen anyway so the Courts can finally put the entire matter of what constitutes fair use to rest.
I'm surprised the Music Industry at large isn't telling this little guy to sit down and stfu.
They know all to well what will happen should the ruling go against them.