Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
United States

Journal ncc74656's Journal: NY Times Poll: 9/11 Families Blame Clinton 5

NY Times Poll: 9/11 Families Blame Clinton

A New York Times poll of 9/11 victim families released on Sunday shows that more Americans who lost relatives in the worst terrorist attack in the nation's history hold President Clinton responsible rather than President Bush.

"As for assigning blame, more of those interviewed blamed former President Bill Clinton than blamed Mr. Bush for the awful human damage inflicted on American soil that day," the Times said.

The paper declined to release specific figures for the finding, based on a survey of 339 relatives of 9/11 victims, explaining, "The study differs from a scientific survey in that the total population of living relatives of 9/11 victims is unknown and therefore could not be sampled precisely or randomly."

This discussion was created by ncc74656 (45571) for no Foes, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NY Times Poll: 9/11 Families Blame Clinton

Comments Filter:
  • they keep using the good work of a single border guard as an example of how they (Clinton Adm.) stopped the millenium bombing plot. The guy did his job, and he alone deserves credit for it.
  • well ok (Score:2, Insightful)

    by ellem ( 147712 ) *
    I'm for this poll but seriously, conservative as I ma be, NewsMax is hardly credible.
    • I'm for this poll but seriously, conservative as I ma be, NewsMax is hardly credible.

      FWIW, the Times did say it was an unscientific poll.

      In a more lighthearted vein, Fox News Sunday mentioned a poll yesterday conducted for the American Kennel Club of who you'd trust to walk your dog. It probably means bugger-all as far as the election goes, but Bush won by about 15 points. We know W has one or two dogs. Does Lurch have any pets? He comes across to me as the type who'd rather kick a dog than walk i

The amount of beauty required launch 1 ship = 1 Millihelen

Working...