Subject | Datestamp | Replies | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Re:Writing has been on the wall | ||||||
attached to Dell Dumping Itanium | ||||||
Re:Oh, wonderful | ||||||
attached to Usability Eye for The GIMP Guy | ||||||
Re:For the rest of us... | ||||||
This is not news | ||||||
attached to AMD Alleges Intel Compilers Create Slower AMD Code | ||||||
Re:Because | ||||||
Re:It's a pain in the ass | ||||||
Intanium was introduced too late. And too early. | ||||||
attached to Why Doesn't the Itanium Get the Respect It's Due? | ||||||
Re:So what happened to this reporter? Cancer? | ||||||
attached to Censored Nagasaki Bomb Story Found | ||||||
Re:This is bullshit. | ||||||
attached to Apple Switching to Intel | ||||||
Re:I call bad c code | ||||||
Re:Adverse Affect For Me | ||||||
attached to Porting Open Source to Minor Platforms is Harmful | ||||||
Typical for Apple in the FOSS world | ||||||
attached to Safari vs. KHTML | ||||||
Re:-ftree-* | ||||||
Re:4.0.0 broke backward compatibility big time | ||||||
attached to A Review of GCC 4.0 | ||||||
Re:Is anyone else curious what SSA trees are? | ||||||
Re:i'm having horrible flashbacks... | ||||||
Re:"Paltry" is probably a poor choice of words | ||||||
Re:GCC 4.0's biggest winner is probably KDE | ||||||
attached to GCC 4.0.0 Released | ||||||
Re:GNU | ||||||
attached to Hurd/L4 Developer Marcus Brinkmann Interviewed | ||||||
Re:C++ compiler | ||||||
Re:PathScale... looks interesting... | ||||||
Re:Shockingly better? | ||||||
Re:Latest Fedora-development has gcc 4.0 | ||||||
Re:More incompatibilities on the way? | ||||||
attached to GCC 4.0 Preview | ||||||
Good day to avoid cops. Crawl to work.