I think I would rather they concentrate on putting more government information online, making government more open rather than implementing systems to make citizens prove who they are.
The rest of the article does gets a little wishy-washy talking about the 'Denver Dose' and other concepts that are nothing besides poorly supported theories, and even goes to complain that the current best model of the dangers of radiation doesn't fit with his own hopes and wishes. Nevertheless the graphic ATMAvator complains of doesn't have the faults he attributes to it.
An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.