Totally disagree on deepseek. Deepseek doesn't mean you need 5% of the GPUs, it means various aspects of AI are now 95% cheaper. That raises overall demand and makes more uses of AI viable. You can now afford to run a better AI for the same price.

Agree on the overall premise that predicting 2030, let alone 2050, is likely a fruitless exercise. Photography was a viable industry 100 years ago and 30 years ago. Only in the last 10 years with the rise of influencers has the value of it completely tanked. A better analogy is that photography 30 years ago, you might have managed to do it without leveraging Photoshop as a tool. Anyone who has made it the past decade is proficient in PS or an equivalent as industries adopt new tools.

The way I develop software now does not closely resemble the way I started my career.

Getting into tech was a trend visible to late gen X, and if you chose it for your career it was probably a good choice. Certainly worked out for me. That's very different from saying that getting into well respected creative fields were bad career moves. Who knew that writing words was going to get so commoditized?
  Similarly, we've been banging the STEM drum for decades. Not everyone is suited for a STEM career, and we shouldn't try to force feed everyone into doing it. A lot of the fields in the articles were the places non-STEM used to go. STEM isn't safe either, we're just not quite there yet with AI. We're a lot closer than we were last year, but that's a separate topic.

But the last bit, telling people to get into GPUs and Quantum? That's like telling someone they aren't hustling enough and need to go door to door and drop off resumes to whoever answers until they land a job. I'm technically an EE, so I know a lot of folks who did it. It's not something you can go train for in six months, it's generally something where graduate degrees are preferred. Quantum is the toughest maths I've ever tried to tackle, and I consider myself good at math to a point where the word appears on my diploma. We did a book club at work on quantum a while back, and I can barely understand the simplest of the basics enough to follow along once you try to understand it beyond Schrödinger's cat. I'd rather tell a kid to go take a computer graphics course at undergrad and then go apply to NVDA.

Can't sell as many ads on a nsfw subreddit, but this whole shortsighted scorched earth policy from the CEO is getting out of hand.

But if you don't upload your data, how else will the simulation of your mother be able to talk to you after you're gone?

> If the machine is only a few months old, look at the TPM and Secure Boot settings in the BIOS. These have to be enabled to pass the hardware check.

I expect a company like MS to tell me that my hardware is supported and to enable things in BIOS, if I have a MB that supports the settings. MS isn't some small developer who doesn't have the resources to make a hardware compatibility list based on actual model numbers.

I use the default camera app, and it'll show me the beginning of the URL.

Definitely something to consider with QR code menus becoming popular.

We had to look at this a couple of days ago. I was horrified to discover that the default codecov integration for circleci involves this method.

I wonder if what JPMorgan calls "younger employees", most companies would call "older employees with young children". New grads have their own sets of issues, but if you're a few years out of school, you're not a "younger employee" any more.
  It's too bad none of the articles define what JPMorgan means.

Because I have no idea who the ISP is when I travel.

If I'm at home, this is probably overkill.

If I use google without dnssec or dns-over-https, then it's easy to see which sites I visit.

https://cloud.google.com/beyondcorp/

But it's hard to bolt onto an existing infrastructure without restricting it.

"attacked"

Do people not understand the concept of security research? What would you prefer they do, wait for someone else to discover vulnerabilities and not notify tor?

I've done both several times, and I'm always happier when I just buy a decent workstation and stick a graphics card into it without tweaking the settings.

It is no fun after the first few hours trying to figure out why your machine isn't stable and likes to hang.

Your main point has merit, but this particular one cracks me up.

I think I've had one discussion ever regarding our sports teams, and it was from someone who was a member of a rival div iii football team.

Bring Your Own Device definitely makes things more complicated, but that has nothing to do with the age of workers.

You sound like a MS shill, because the bug would not have been automatically disclosed if Microsoft had attempted to contact Google regarding this bug within 90 days.