Comment Re: ROM? (Score 1) 31
should we accept phrases such as the "statue of limitations" or "doggy dog world" as correct just because many people use them and we can understand what they mean?
I'd say yes, though I understand why you might say no. It kills me a little inside every time someone says "literally" when they mean "figuratively", but rationally I know that the word is changing (has changed?) meaning, and it is just used to emphasize the speaker's point. It's an eternal struggle for those who try to keep the language in check, and those who don't. In the end, it always changes, no matter how hard anyone tries to stop it. The rate of change of the language just depends on how those two forces balance out.
And yes, this is now way off topic, but frankly it's the more interesting part to me (nothing against Goldeneye). I don't think it's pedantic, but I think that just depends on whether you find the topic of language change interesting or boring. Personally, I'm fascinated by it.