Re:Getting ahead of themselves (Score 1)

There are many layers to this, which I don't have time to elaborate on. Apparently the Congress thinks it voted for something significant on this topic. But more to the point, the idea of "declaring war" needs to be updated, since the traditional format requires that there be another country to declare war against. How do you declare war, in the formal sense of the term ( which is clearly what you are demanding), against an enemy that is nothing but an informally organized, multi-country conspiracy? That is, nevertheless, able to cause significant fatalities and economic damage? And with nuclear weapons on the loose.....? Come on people, its time to THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX!