That is exactly the reason why he is taking legal action. The whole Nazi themed bit was made up* by the News of the World to sell more news papers. Yet hear you are repeating it as if it were true. I'm no fan of MM - he may be a pervert but he's not a Nazi pervert.

* http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/24_07_08mosleyvnewsgroup.pdf

Page 54, section 232

If you are based in the UK there is the E-petitions website:

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/search?q=sopa

Omega-3 Fatty Acids supress inflamation which is whats causing the pain in your RSI

More info at here.

There is plugin for browsers called Xmarks that will cache your bookmarks, passwords and session to an FTP server. I've been using it for a while on my own FTP box, apparently it works for IE and Chrome too but I only use it with FF.

The BBC board are not stupid, they know applying to have tax payer funded content restricted isnt going to fly. They are maneuvering to cover their backs. Despite what they say the BBC are very ratings focused. They are going head to head with ITV (the biggest independent TV station in the UK) over the Saturday night prime slot with their own reality TV/talent show for example.

They want to broadcast popular shows but dont want content restriction to be used as leverage by the content providers. Rather than saying "we wont do that b/c its not in the public interest" the BBC are aiming to say "We cant use DRM b/c its against the law."

>There are plenty of carbs that humans can digest without cooking

Fruit as I've already said contains sugar which is refined carbs. The dominant macro nutrient in nuts if fat (yes thats so called nasty sat fat too). By vegetables I take it you mean roots vegetables (carrots, parsnips, potatoes, etc) see my original point, the carbohydrate providing vegetables still need cooking before they can be consumed.

Yes I've heard of whole grain, Oats and the like still need to be cooked before the body can access the carbs in them - if you eat raw oats its just counts as fiber. Which is exactly my point - humans cant process any carbs other than sugar with out some form of processing. The whole business of cooking your food isnt to make it taste nice, its to break down cell walls, denature the anti-germination enzymes so that the human gut can extract usable nutrients. Cooking also denatures toxins like alkaloids that are present in potatoes for example.

>But please don't spread bullshit.

Likewise Mr AC.

I'm always amused when this kind of research comes out, talking about how fats are bad for you. Its much more complex than that. You really should be measure total calorie amount not just fat content. Too many calories is bad full stop. As other posters have mentioned the lack of energy is probably only a short term effect of switching to fat as a fuel source. I've switched over to a high fat/low carb diet (F50/P30/C20) and have no issues with lethargy or lack of concentration. I've got no problems with day to day programming tasks and haven't encountered any strength or endurance degradation in the gym.

I'm of the option that fat - esp saturated fat - is a much heather macro nutrient that carbs. The only carbs that the human digestive system can process in a raw state is sugar (think fruit), starch can be converted to sugar also but most of the other so called healthy carb sources needs processing before humans can consume them. Potatoes have to be cooked (try eating raw potatoes and see what happens), as does rice, wheat and grains have to be ground down into a powder. Fat on the other hand can be eaten straight off the animal. Humans aren't evolved to eat significant amounts of carbs.

Dont use Acrobat... There are several alternatives available all less bloated:

GPL'd PDF reader: http://blog.kowalczyk.info/software/sumatrapdf/index.html

Commercial: http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/reader/

All the heavy unstable elements already have names derived from their atomic mass, so 112 would be Ununbium

Its also slap bang in the middle of the island of stability most heavy elements are too unstable to last before they decay into smaller elements. 112 Has a half life of 29 seconds, which isnt too bad considering 115 has a half life of 88ms.