Comment Re:sad (Score 5, Insightful) 147
What disturbing to me is that they made him sign these statements:
Mr Moore acknowledged: "It is not and has never been the case that [a] person has the right to make a 'back-up' copy in any digital media of [any] commercially released sound recording."
Would this hold up in US court since there is actual written law about the right to "back-up" / "Fair-use"????
Music Industry Piracy Investigation Unit spokesman Michael Speck said the case confirmed use of CD burners constituted a breach of copyright.
"Any legitimate use of them is purely incidental to their main purpose which is to infringe copyright," he said.
How can these people be considered "experts" when they make statements like this!!!
Mr Moore acknowledged: "It is not and has never been the case that [a] person has the right to make a 'back-up' copy in any digital media of [any] commercially released sound recording."
Would this hold up in US court since there is actual written law about the right to "back-up" / "Fair-use"????
Music Industry Piracy Investigation Unit spokesman Michael Speck said the case confirmed use of CD burners constituted a breach of copyright.
"Any legitimate use of them is purely incidental to their main purpose which is to infringe copyright," he said.
How can these people be considered "experts" when they make statements like this!!!
